Literature DB >> 19345104

Communal nutrition in ants.

Audrey Dussutour1, Stephen J Simpson.   

Abstract

Studies on nonsocial insects have elucidated the regulatory strategies employed to meet nutritional demands [1-3]. However, how social insects maintain the supply of an appropriate balance of nutrients at both a collective and an individual level remains unknown. Sociality complicates nutritional regulatory strategies [4-6]. First, the food entering a colony is collected by a small number of workers, which need to adjust their harvesting strategy to the demands for nutrients among individuals within the colony [4-7]. Second, because carbohydrates are used by the workers and proteins consumed by the larvae [7-14], nutritional feedbacks emanating from both must exist and be integrated to determine food exploitation by foragers [4-6, 15, 16]. Here, we show that foraging ants can solve nutritional challenges for the colony by making intricate adjustments to their feeding behavior and nutrient processing, acting both as a collective mouth and gut. The amount and balance of nutrients collected and the precision of regulation depend on the presence of larvae in the colony. Ants improved the macronutrient balance of collected foods by extracting carbohydrates and ejecting proteins. Nevertheless, processing excess protein shortened life span--an effect that was greatly ameliorated in the presence of larvae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345104     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  59 in total

1.  Intercontinental differences in resource use reveal the importance of mutualisms in fire ant invasions.

Authors:  Shawn M Wilder; David A Holway; Andrew V Suarez; Edward G LeBrun; Micky D Eubanks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Optimal foraging for specific nutrients in predatory beetles.

Authors:  Kim Jensen; David Mayntz; Søren Toft; Fiona J Clissold; John Hunt; David Raubenheimer; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Colony variation in the collective regulation of foraging by harvester ants.

Authors:  Deborah M Gordon; Adam Guetz; Michael J Greene; Susan Holmes
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Collective retention and transmission of chemical signals in a social insect.

Authors:  Katherine P Gill; Ellen van Wilgenburg; Peter Taylor; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-02-12

5.  Ant workers die young and colonies collapse when fed a high-protein diet.

Authors:  A Dussutour; S J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Modelling the ecological niche from functional traits.

Authors:  Michael Kearney; Stephen J Simpson; David Raubenheimer; Brian Helmuth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Macronutrient ratios in pollen shape bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) foraging strategies and floral preferences.

Authors:  Anthony D Vaudo; Harland M Patch; David A Mortensen; John F Tooker; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Amoeboid organism solves complex nutritional challenges.

Authors:  Audrey Dussutour; Tanya Latty; Madeleine Beekman; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Stable isotopes reveal links between human food inputs and urban ant diets.

Authors:  Clint A Penick; Amy M Savage; Robert R Dunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  A carbohydrate-rich diet increases social immunity in ants.

Authors:  Adam D Kay; Abbie J Bruning; Andy van Alst; Tyler T Abrahamson; W O H Hughes; Michael Kaspari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.