Literature DB >> 19344554

General paediatric surgical provision of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in a district general hospital--a 12-year experience.

T Sathesh-Kumar1, Hazel Rollins, Sarah Cheslyn-Curtis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A small, but significant, number of children require long-term nutritional support. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of providing a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) service for children in a district general hospital and to raise awareness of the suitability of the procedure to be performed on paediatric surgery lists in similar hospitals across the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary paediatric nutrition team was established and all children accepted for PEG insertion between 1995 and 2007 were entered onto a database prospectively and are included in this study. PEG tubes were inserted by the standard pull-through technique under general anaesthetic.
RESULTS: A total of 172 procedures were performed in 76 children. The median age at first tube insertion was 3 years (range, 0.5-18 years). Length of follow-up ranged from 1 month to 12.6 years. Fifty-eight children (76%) had a neurological abnormality, the commonest being cerebral palsy. All but one procedure were performed successfully, of which 63 (37%) were new insertions, 99 change of tube, 4 changed from surgical gastrostomy and 6 from PEG to button gastrostomy. The median hospital stay was 2 days (range, 2-7 days) for new insertions and 1 day for tube changes. There were 10 (6%) early complications within 30 days, the commonest being peritubal infection (6). The 39 late complications included 16 peritubal infection/granulomata, 9 'buried bumpers', 4 worsening of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, 2 gastrocolic fistulae, 3 gastrocutaneous fistulae and 4 tubal migration. There was no mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that paediatric PEG procedures and continuing management by a supporting team can be successfully and efficiently provided in the district general hospital. It should be possible for the majority of similar hospitals to provide local access and increase the availability of PEG feeding for children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19344554      PMCID: PMC2758436          DOI: 10.1308/003588409X391749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  26 in total

1.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  L Gossner; J Keymling; E G Hahn; C Ell
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  M Ljungdahl; M Sundbom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A new endoscopic technique for the buried bumper syndrome.

Authors:  E Leung; L Chung; A Hamouda; A H M Nassar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Complications following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and subsequent catheter replacement in children and young adults.

Authors:  V L Fox; S D Abel; S Malas; C Duggan; A M Leichtner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Gastrocutaneous fistula in children after removal of gastrostomy tube: incidence and predictive factors.

Authors:  J M Gordon; J C Langer
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Improvement of children's nutritional status after enteral feeding by PEG: an interim report.

Authors:  C Q Brant; P Stanich; A P Ferrari
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in paediatric practice: complications and outcome.

Authors:  I U Khattak; C Kimber; E M Kiely; L Spitz
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Diagnosis and treatment of feeding disorders in children with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  S M Schwarz; J Corredor; J Fisher-Medina; J Cohen; S Rabinowitz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  A prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with acute dysphagic stroke.

Authors:  B B Hamidon; S A Abdullah; M F Zawawi; N Sukumar; A Aminuddin; A A Raymond
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  2006-03

10.  Survey of general paediatric surgery provision in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

Authors:  J K Pye
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gastrostomy insertion in the 21st century: PEG or laparoscopic? Report from a large single-centre series.

Authors:  Ruth Clare Wragg; Heidi Salminen; Max Pachl; Michael Singh; Anthony Lander; Ingo Jester; Dakshesh Parikh; Girish Jawaheer
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  The relationship between percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Louise J Noble; A Mark Dalzell; Wael El-Matary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.