AIMS: We have demonstrated previously that acute smoking abstinence is associated with lowered reward motivation and impaired response inhibition. This prospective study explores whether these impairments, along with withdrawal-related symptoms, recover over 3 months of sustained abstinence. DESIGN: Participants completed a 12-hour abstinent baseline assessment and were then allocated randomly to quit unaided or continue smoking. All were re-tested after 7 days, 1 month and 3 months. Successful quitters' scores were compared with those of continuing smokers, who were tested after ad libitum smoking. SETTING: Goldsmiths, University of London. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 33 smokers who maintained abstinence to 3 months, and 31 continuing smokers. MEASUREMENTS: Indices demonstrated previously in this cohort of smokers to be sensitive to the effect of nicotine versus acute abstinence: reward motivation [Snaith-Hamilton pleasure scale (SHAPS), Card Arranging Reward Responsivity Objective Test (CARROT), Stroop], tasks of response inhibition [anti-saccade task; Continuous Performance Task (CPT)], clinical indices of mood [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)], withdrawal symptoms [Mood and Physical Symptoms Scale (MPSS)] and desire to smoke. FINDINGS:SHAPS anhedonia and reward responsivity (CARROT) showed significant improvement and plateaued after a month of abstinence, not differing from the scores of continuing smokers tested in a satiated state. Mood, other withdrawal symptoms and desire to smoke all declined from acute abstinence to 1 month of cessation and were equivalent to, or lower than, the levels reported by continuing, satiated smokers. Neither group showed a change in CPT errors over time while continuing smokers, but not abstainers, showed improved accuracy on the anti-saccade task at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Appetitive processes and related affective states appear to improve in smokers who remain nicotine-free for 3 months, whereas response inhibition does not. Although in need of replication, the results suggest tentatively that poor inhibitory control may constitute a long-term risk factor for relapse and could be a target for intervention.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: We have demonstrated previously that acute smoking abstinence is associated with lowered reward motivation and impaired response inhibition. This prospective study explores whether these impairments, along with withdrawal-related symptoms, recover over 3 months of sustained abstinence. DESIGN:Participants completed a 12-hour abstinent baseline assessment and were then allocated randomly to quit unaided or continue smoking. All were re-tested after 7 days, 1 month and 3 months. Successful quitters' scores were compared with those of continuing smokers, who were tested after ad libitum smoking. SETTING: Goldsmiths, University of London. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 33 smokers who maintained abstinence to 3 months, and 31 continuing smokers. MEASUREMENTS: Indices demonstrated previously in this cohort of smokers to be sensitive to the effect of nicotine versus acute abstinence: reward motivation [Snaith-Hamilton pleasure scale (SHAPS), Card Arranging Reward Responsivity Objective Test (CARROT), Stroop], tasks of response inhibition [anti-saccade task; Continuous Performance Task (CPT)], clinical indices of mood [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)], withdrawal symptoms [Mood and Physical Symptoms Scale (MPSS)] and desire to smoke. FINDINGS: SHAPS anhedonia and reward responsivity (CARROT) showed significant improvement and plateaued after a month of abstinence, not differing from the scores of continuing smokers tested in a satiated state. Mood, other withdrawal symptoms and desire to smoke all declined from acute abstinence to 1 month of cessation and were equivalent to, or lower than, the levels reported by continuing, satiated smokers. Neither group showed a change in CPT errors over time while continuing smokers, but not abstainers, showed improved accuracy on the anti-saccade task at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Appetitive processes and related affective states appear to improve in smokers who remain nicotine-free for 3 months, whereas response inhibition does not. Although in need of replication, the results suggest tentatively that poor inhibitory control may constitute a long-term risk factor for relapse and could be a target for intervention.
Authors: M Ernst; J A Matochik; S J Heishman; J D Van Horn; P H Jons; J E Henningfield; E D London Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-03-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jasmine Pettiford; Rachel V Kozink; Avery M Lutz; Scott H Kollins; Jed E Rose; F Joseph McClernon Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2007-03-07 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: David G Gilbert; F Joseph McClernon; Norka E Rabinovich; Louisette C Plath; Carmen L Masson; Allison E Anderson; Kaye F Sly Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2002-02
Authors: Timothy B Baker; Megan E Piper; Tanya R Schlam; Jessica W Cook; Stevens S Smith; Wei-Yin Loh; Daniel Bolt Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2012-05-28
Authors: Amir Abdolahi; Geoffrey C Williams; Curtis G Benesch; Henry Z Wang; Eric M Spitzer; Bryan E Scott; Robert C Block; Edwin van Wijngaarden Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2015-07-06 Impact factor: 3.913