PURPOSE: To compare the results of anterior and posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis created using forceps with those created using vitrector in eyes suffering from congenital cataract. METHODS:Twenty-eight eyes with congenital cataract were included in the study. The anterior and posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexes were created using microforceps in 17 eyes or through a vitrector in 11 eyes. RESULTS:Corneal edema (P = .56) and anterior chamber flare (P = 1.0) were comparable in both groups. In addition, the time for optical axis clarity was also similar between the groups (P = .98). CONCLUSION: The current results suggest that the use of both techniques appears to be equally safe and effective for the achievement of anterior and posterior capsulorhexis.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare the results of anterior and posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis created using forceps with those created using vitrector in eyes suffering from congenital cataract. METHODS: Twenty-eight eyes with congenital cataract were included in the study. The anterior and posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexes were created using microforceps in 17 eyes or through a vitrector in 11 eyes. RESULTS:Corneal edema (P = .56) and anterior chamber flare (P = 1.0) were comparable in both groups. In addition, the time for optical axis clarity was also similar between the groups (P = .98). CONCLUSION: The current results suggest that the use of both techniques appears to be equally safe and effective for the achievement of anterior and posterior capsulorhexis.