PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an electrical device for dental adhesive application (ElectroBond) influences bonding of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human teeth were selected and cut perpendicularly to their long axis to expose middle/ deep dentin. Specimens were then longitudinally sectioned into halves (experimental and control halves) to create two similar bonding substrates. Experimental halves were bonded using an ElectroBond-assisted application, while control halves were bonded with disposable sponges. The adhesives tested were Adper Scotchbond 1XT and XP-BOND. Bonded specimens were submitted to the microtensile bond strength test. Additional adhesive interfaces were prepared and processed for nanoleakage investigation involving TEM examination. RESULTS: The microtensile bond test revealed higher values (p < 0.05) for both adhesives if ElectroBond was used during layering (55.5 +/- 7.9 MPa for Adper Scotchbond 1XT and 54.7 +/- 7.1 MPa for XP-BOND) compared to the conventional mechanical adhesive application technique (41.1 +/- 6.1 MPa for Adper Scotchbond 1XT and 38.0 +/- 7.8 MPa for XP-BOND). No difference between the two adhesives was found under the same application conditions. With electricity-assisted application, TEM micrographs revealed a significant decrease in nanoleakage expression compared to the controls. CONCLUSION: The use of an electric current produced by ElectroBond during the application of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives may enhance resin impregnation, thus improving dentin hybridization. Further studies should be done to confirm that this device can similarly improve adhesive application in vivo.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an electrical device for dental adhesive application (ElectroBond) influences bonding of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Human teeth were selected and cut perpendicularly to their long axis to expose middle/ deep dentin. Specimens were then longitudinally sectioned into halves (experimental and control halves) to create two similar bonding substrates. Experimental halves were bonded using an ElectroBond-assisted application, while control halves were bonded with disposable sponges. The adhesives tested were Adper Scotchbond 1XT and XP-BOND. Bonded specimens were submitted to the microtensile bond strength test. Additional adhesive interfaces were prepared and processed for nanoleakage investigation involving TEM examination. RESULTS: The microtensile bond test revealed higher values (p < 0.05) for both adhesives if ElectroBond was used during layering (55.5 +/- 7.9 MPa for Adper Scotchbond 1XT and 54.7 +/- 7.1 MPa for XP-BOND) compared to the conventional mechanical adhesive application technique (41.1 +/- 6.1 MPa for Adper Scotchbond 1XT and 38.0 +/- 7.8 MPa for XP-BOND). No difference between the two adhesives was found under the same application conditions. With electricity-assisted application, TEM micrographs revealed a significant decrease in nanoleakage expression compared to the controls. CONCLUSION: The use of an electric current produced by ElectroBond during the application of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives may enhance resin impregnation, thus improving dentin hybridization. Further studies should be done to confirm that this device can similarly improve adhesive application in vivo.
Authors: Marco Breschi; Davide Fabiani; Leonardo Sandrolini; Martino Colonna; Laura Sisti; Micaela Vannini; Annalisa Mazzoni; Alessandra Ruggeri; David H Pashley; Lorenzo Breschi Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2012-07-07 Impact factor: 5.304