Literature DB >> 19343822

Evaluation of the VITEK 2 cards for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of non-glucose-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli.

Wen-Shyang Hsieh1, Ling-Ling Sung, Kun-Chou Tsai, Hsin-Tsung Ho.   

Abstract

We evaluated VITEK 2 cards (NGNC and AST-GN10) for the accuracy of identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of non-glucose-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NGF-GNB). In a total of 201 strains, 190 strains (94.5%) were correctly identified, seven strains (3.5%)showed low discrimination, four strains (2.0%) had discrepancies, and no strain remained unidentified.Reference AST of amikacin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, imipenem,levofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was performed by the agar dilution method. Approximately 82.5% of ID and 72.9% of AST were completed within 7 and 14 h,respectively. For NGF-GNB, other than Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and the Burkholderia cepacia group, essential agreements (EAs) were 93.6-100.0%. Severe disagreements (resistant by the reference method to susceptible by AST-GN10) were observed for amikacin(0.9%), cefepime (1.8%), cefotaxime (1.8%), imipenem (0.9%), and piperacillin-tazobactam (0.9%).One major disagreement (susceptible to resistant) was observed for ceftazidime (0.1%). For P. aeruginosa,EAs were 85.7-100%, with severe disagreements observed for cefepime (4.8%) and piperacillin-tazobactam(4.8%). For Acinetobacter spp., EAs were 86.4-100% without disagreements. The VITEK 2 cards appear to be promising for rapid ID and reliable AST for most species of NGF-GNB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19343822     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2009.02436.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  5 in total

1.  Phoenix 100 versus Vitek 2 in the identification of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kalliopi-Stavroula Chatzigeorgiou; Theodoros N Sergentanis; Sotirios Tsiodras; Stavros J Hamodrakas; Pantelis G Bagos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Carbapenem susceptibility testing errors using three automated systems, disk diffusion, Etest, and broth microdilution and carbapenem resistance genes in isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex.

Authors:  Ana Elizabeth Markelz; Katrin Mende; Clinton K Murray; Xin Yu; Wendy C Zera; Duane R Hospenthal; Miriam L Beckius; Tatjana Calvano; Kevin S Akers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Aminoglycoside resistance and susceptibility testing errors in Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex.

Authors:  Kevin S Akers; Chris Chaney; Alice Barsoumian; Miriam Beckius; Wendy Zera; Xin Yu; Charles Guymon; Edward F Keen; Brian J Robinson; Katrin Mende; Clinton K Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Holly K Huse; Mark J Lee; Mandy Wootton; Susan E Sharp; Maria Traczewski; John J LiPuma; Peter Jorth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus spp.

Authors:  Michael Hombach; Marion Jetter; Nicolas Blöchliger; Natalia Kolesnik-Goldmann; Peter M Keller; Erik C Böttger
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.