Literature DB >> 19343730

Optimizing molecular signatures for predicting prostate cancer recurrence.

Yijun Sun1, Steve Goodison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The derivation of molecular signatures indicative of disease status and predictive of subsequent behavior could facilitate the optimal choice of treatment for prostate cancer patients.
METHODS: In this study, we conducted a computational analysis of gene expression profile data obtained from 79 cases, 39 of which were classified as having disease recurrence, to investigate whether advanced computational algorithms can derive more accurate prognostic signatures for prostate cancer.
RESULTS: At the 90% sensitivity level, a newly derived prognostic genetic signature achieved 85% specificity. This is the first reported genetic signature to outperform a clinically used postoperative nomogram. Furthermore, a hybrid prognostic signature derived by combination of the nomogram and gene expression data significantly outperformed both genetic and clinical signatures, and achieved a specificity of 95%.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing gene expression information for highly accurate prostate cancer prognosis beyond the current clinical systems, and shows that more advanced computational modeling of tissue-derived microarray data is warranted before clinical application of molecular signatures is considered. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19343730      PMCID: PMC3425355          DOI: 10.1002/pros.20961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  29 in total

1.  Integration of gene expression profiling and clinical variables to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Stephenson; Alex Smith; Michael W Kattan; Jaya Satagopan; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; William L Gerald
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  M Han; A W Partin; C R Pound; J I Epstein; P C Walsh
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Apoptosis factor EI24/PIG8 is a novel endoplasmic reticulum-localized Bcl-2-binding protein which is associated with suppression of breast cancer invasiveness.

Authors:  Xiansi Zhao; Robert E Ayer; Shannon L Davis; Sarah J Ames; Brian Florence; Cyrus Torchinsky; James S Liou; Ling Shen; Remco A Spanjaard
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M L Blute; E J Bergstralh; A Iocca; B Scherer; H Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The RhoGAP protein DLC-1 functions as a metastasis suppressor in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Steve Goodison; Jing Yuan; Derek Sloan; Ryung Kim; Cheng Li; Nicholas C Popescu; Virginia Urquidi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Ribosomal protein L23 activates p53 by inhibiting MDM2 function in response to ribosomal perturbation but not to translation inhibition.

Authors:  Mu-Shui Dai; Shelya X Zeng; Yetao Jin; Xiao-Xin Sun; Larry David; Hua Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 8.  MDM2 and prognosis.

Authors:  Kenan Onel; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.852

9.  Gene expression correlates of clinical prostate cancer behavior.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh; Phillip G Febbo; Kenneth Ross; Donald G Jackson; Judith Manola; Christine Ladd; Pablo Tamayo; Andrew A Renshaw; Anthony V D'Amico; Jerome P Richie; Eric S Lander; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Todd R Golub; William R Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  Comprehensive gene expression analysis of prostate cancer reveals distinct transcriptional programs associated with metastatic disease.

Authors:  Eva LaTulippe; Jaya Satagopan; Alex Smith; Howard Scher; Peter Scardino; Victor Reuter; William L Gerald
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  36 in total

1.  Cancer progression modeling using static sample data.

Authors:  Yijun Sun; Jin Yao; Norma J Nowak; Steve Goodison
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 13.583

2.  RB Loss Promotes Prostate Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Chellappagounder Thangavel; Ettickan Boopathi; Yi Liu; Alex Haber; Adam Ertel; Anshul Bhardwaj; Sankar Addya; Noelle Williams; Stephen J Ciment; Paolo Cotzia; Jeffry L Dean; Adam Snook; Chris McNair; Matt Price; James R Hernandez; Shuang G Zhao; Ruth Birbe; James B McCarthy; Eva A Turley; Kenneth J Pienta; Felix Y Feng; Adam P Dicker; Karen E Knudsen; Robert B Den
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Stromal responses among common carcinomas correlated with clinicopathologic features.

Authors:  Julia L-Y Chen; Iñigo Espinosa; Albert Y Lin; Olivia Y-W Liao; Matt van de Rijn; Robert B West
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Metabolomic profiling identifies biochemical pathways associated with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Akash K Kaushik; Shaiju K Vareed; Sumanta Basu; Vasanta Putluri; Nagireddy Putluri; Katrin Panzitt; Christine A Brennan; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Ismael A Vergara; Nicholas Erho; Nancy L Weigel; Nicholas Mitsiades; Ali Shojaie; Ganesh Palapattu; George Michailidis; Arun Sreekumar
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 5.  Molecular diagnostic trends in urological cancer: biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis.

Authors:  V Urquidi; C J Rosser; S Goodison
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Diagnosis of prostate cancer using differentially expressed genes in stroma.

Authors:  Zhenyu Jia; Yipeng Wang; Anne Sawyers; Huazhen Yao; Farahnaz Rahmatpanah; Xiao-Qin Xia; Qiang Xu; Rebecca Pio; Tolga Turan; James A Koziol; Steve Goodison; Philip Carpenter; Jessica Wang-Rodriguez; Anne Simoneau; Frank Meyskens; Manuel Sutton; Waldemar Lernhardt; Thomas Beach; Joseph Monforte; Michael McClelland; Dan Mercola
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Urinary glycoprotein biomarker discovery for bladder cancer detection using LC/MS-MS and label-free quantification.

Authors:  Na Yang; Shun Feng; Kerby Shedden; Xiaolei Xie; Yashu Liu; Charles J Rosser; David M Lubman; Steven Goodison
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Derivation of cancer diagnostic and prognostic signatures from gene expression data.

Authors:  Steve Goodison; Yijun Sun; Virginia Urquidi
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  A candidate molecular biomarker panel for the detection of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Virginia Urquidi; Steve Goodison; Yunpeng Cai; Yijun Sun; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 10.  Urinary proteomic profiling for diagnostic bladder cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Steve Goodison; Charles J Rosser; Virginia Urquidi
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.940

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.