Literature DB >> 19343294

[Economic evaluation in health care].

Ingrid Zechmeister1, Philipp Radlberger.   

Abstract

Economic evaluation of healthcare programmes helps us to assure the efficient use of healthcare resources. Cost-minimisation analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, cost-utility analysis and cost-benefit analysis are the most commonly applied evaluation types. They differ in how they measure outcomes of healthcare interventions. Several guidelines for conducting economic evaluations exist. Furthermore, checklists have been developed for systematic critical appraisal of economic evaluations. Even though economic evaluations increase the transparency of resource allocation decisions and make decision criteria more explicit, they do not replace public discussions on the availability of overall resources for the public health care system.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19343294     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-008-0548-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  10 in total

1.  The 'fair innings argument' deserves a fairer hearing! Comments by Alan Williams on Nord and Johannesson.

Authors:  A Williams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review.

Authors:  S Anand; K Hanson
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Authors:  Z Philips; L Ginnelly; M Sculpher; K Claxton; S Golder; R Riemsma; N Woolacoot; J Glanville
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Complexity and reflexivity: two important issues for economic evaluation in health care.

Authors:  Chantale Lessard
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.

Authors:  M F Drummond; T O Jefferson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-03

6.  Using willingness to pay to value alternative models of antenatal care.

Authors:  M Ryan; J Ratcliffe; J Tucker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  QALYs and mental health care.

Authors:  D Chisholm; A Healey; M Knapp
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  Cost effectiveness of simvastatin treatment to lower cholesterol levels in patients with coronary heart disease. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group.

Authors:  M Johannesson; B Jönsson; J Kjekshus; A G Olsson; T R Pedersen; H Wedel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  QALYfying the value of life.

Authors:  J Harris
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes.

Authors:  E Nord; J L Pinto; J Richardson; P Menzel; P Ubel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.046

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.