| Literature DB >> 19343112 |
Hansjoerg Heep1, Gero Hilken, Sebastian Hofmeister, Christian Wedemeyer.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mechanotransduction is the mechanism that due to reacting chondrocytes on biomechanical loading of body mass. Higher biomechanical loading lead to increased degeneration of chondrocytes, whereas moderate loading is protecting. This suggests that body fat regulates bone metabolism first by means of hormonal factors and second that the effects of muscle and loading are signaling factors in mechanotransduction. Leptin, a peptide hormone produced predominantly by white fat cells, is one of these hormonal factors. The aim of this study was to investigate and measure the different effects of weight-bearing on trabecular bone formation in mice without the stimulation of leptin and with or without osteoarthritis.Entities:
Keywords: Bone mineral density; biomechanical loading; leptin; mice; micro-CT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19343112 PMCID: PMC2664549 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.5.265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Figure 1Grade of Osteoarthritis according to Otte`s method (1969)
Fig 2The curves show the change in body weight in the two groups. In Group A the animals had an ad libitum diet and reached a body weight of over 50 grams after 20 weeks, the animals in Group B had a controlled diet and reached a body weight of over 35 grams after 20 weeks. Inter-group difference was already significant at the age of six weeks (p<0.05).
Statistically significant differences between the ad-libitum-diet Group A and controlled-diet Group B for bone mineral density (BMD) and body weight (p < 0.05) at the age of 20 weeks.
| BMD | Weight (grams) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | mean | SD | mean | SD | |
| Group A (n=20) (ad libitum diet) | 2.57 | 0.147 | 52.53 | 6.36 | |
| Group B (n=20) (controlled diet) | 2.68 | 0.138 | 35.65 | 3.50 | |
| P value | 0.022 | < 0.001 | |||
Figure 3The distribution of osteoarthritis shows a significant decrease for a higher grade in the ad-libitum-diet Group A for the knee compared to the hip (mean = 1.6 to mean = 0.9) (p < 0.05).
Figure 4The correlation between body weight and osteoarthritis shows a significant increase in the grade of osteoarthritis as body weight increased in both the hip (p < 0.002) and knee joint (p < 0.001) (superior line) but not in the osteoarthritis-positive versus the osteoarthritis-negative mice (hip: p = 0.931, knee: p = 0.637) (inferior line).
Correlation was found between body weight and the grade of osteoarthritis in the hip and knee joint in the total population. Otherwise, no correlation was found between body weight and the grade of osteoarthritis of the osteoarthritis-positive mice versus the osteoarthritis-negative mice. The BMD showed no correlation.
| total population (grade of OA) | OA-positive vs. OA-negative (grade of OA) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| body weight | hip | n | 33 | 14 |
| r | 0.52 | -0.026 | ||
| r2 | 0.218 | |||
| p | 0.002 | 0.931 | ||
| knee | n | 34 | 13 | |
| r | 0.601 | 0.127 | ||
| r2 | 0,326 | |||
| p | < 0.001 | 0.679 | ||
| BMD | hip | n | 36 | 16 |
| r | -0.211 | 0.161 | ||
| r2 | 0.039 | |||
| p | 0.216 | 0.552 | ||
| knee | n | 37 | 15 | |
| r | -0.177 | -0.153 | ||
| r2 | 0.043 | |||
| p | 0.295 | 0.586 | ||
Cross-section structural geometric properties of the femur and tibia were evaluated using micro-CT. Note: Summary of morphometric characteristics in the two groups which were different in body weight-bearing. *A statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups only in the trabecular number (Tb.N.) of the femur (p < 0.05) at the age of 20 weeks.
| Position | Group | BV/TV (%) | SD | Tb.Th (mm) | SD | Tb.N (1/mm) | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hip | Group A (n=20) (ad libitum diet) | 60.66 | 6.13 | 0.094 | 0.0069 | 6.42 | 0.45 | |
| Group B (n=20) (controlled diet) | 62.76 | 6.5 | 0.093 | 0.0075 | 6.76 | 0.55 | ||
| P value | 0.347 | 0.412 | 0.038* | |||||
| knee | Group A (n=20) (ad libitum diet) | 52.75 | 3.94 | 0.094 | 0.0063 | 5.63 | 0.34 | |
| Group B (n=20) (controlled diet) | 54.64 | 7.48 | 0.093 | 0.0084 | 5.90 | 0.52 | ||
| P value | 0.325 | 0.561 | 0.058 | |||||
The table shows the correlation between body weight and Micro-CT data for the hip and knee (see in text above).
| total population | OA-positive | OA-negative | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| body weight | BV/TV | hip | n | 37 | 16 | 21 |
| r | -0.054 | 0.636 | - 0.190 | |||
| r2 | 0.003 | 0.404 | 0.036 | |||
| p | 0.752 | 0.015 | 0.437 | |||
| knee | n | 37 | 15 | 22 | ||
| r | -0.093 | -0.213 | 0.202 | |||
| r2 | 0.009 | 0.041 | 0.045 | |||
| p | 0.583 | 0.507 | 0.354 | |||
| Tb.N | hip | n | 37 | 16 | 21 | |
| r | - 0.426 | 0.176 | - 0.342 | |||
| r2 | 0.182 | 0.031 | 0.117 | |||
| p | 0.009 | 0.547 | 0.152 | |||
| knee | n | 37 | 15 | 22 | ||
| r | -0.360 | -0.055 | -0.493 | |||
| r2 | 0.130 | 0.003 | 0.243 | |||
| p | 0.028 | 0.858 | 0.023 | |||
| Tb.Th | hip | n | 37 | 16 | 21 | |
| r | 0.397 | 0.785 | 0.140 | |||
| r2 | 0.158 | 0.617 | 0.02 | |||
| p | 0.015 | 0.001 | 0.568 | |||
| knee | n | 37 | 22 | 15 | ||
| r | 0.247 | 0.171 | 0.330 | |||
| r2 | 0.061 | 0.029 | 0.109 | |||
| p | 0.140 | 0.460 | 0.270 |