M Lomax1, A K McConnell. 1. Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2ER UK. mitch.lomax@port.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A specific inspiratory muscle 'warm-up' (IWU) prior to assessment of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PI(max)) may reduce the number of measurements required to obtain reproducible, representative estimates of PI(max). The influence of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) upon this phenomenon is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Compare the impact of an IWU on the between- and within-day reliability of PI(max) before and after IMT. METHOD: Eight participants were assessed on 4 separate occasions: 2 trials preceded IMT and 2 followed it. At each assessment, the highest of 3 initial efforts was recorded as the pre-IWU value (PI). The highest of 9 subsequent efforts that followed 2 sets of 30 breaths at 40% PI was recorded as PI(max). Following 4 weeks of IMT, the trials were repeated. RESULTS: IWU increased PI by 11-17% (p < or = 0.01), irrespective of IMT status. After IWU, 5-6 efforts were required to determine PI(max), irrespective of IMT status. PI(max) was similar between the 2 trials before IMT and the 2 trials after IMT (p > or = 0.05), and was 21% higher after IMT (p < or = 0.01). The coefficient of variation was excellent before and after IWU, both before (1.9 and 0.6%, respectively) and after IMT (1.1 and 0.3%, respectively). Limits of agreement and sample sizes for effect sizes < or =10% were substantially smaller after IWU in all trials. CONCLUSIONS: (1) IWU enhances the between-day reliability of PI(max) measurement, and this is unaffected by IMT, and (2) judgements regarding acceptability in relation to PI(max) reliability should be made in relation to analytical goals and we present data to facilitate this.
BACKGROUND: A specific inspiratory muscle 'warm-up' (IWU) prior to assessment of maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PI(max)) may reduce the number of measurements required to obtain reproducible, representative estimates of PI(max). The influence of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) upon this phenomenon is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Compare the impact of an IWU on the between- and within-day reliability of PI(max) before and after IMT. METHOD: Eight participants were assessed on 4 separate occasions: 2 trials preceded IMT and 2 followed it. At each assessment, the highest of 3 initial efforts was recorded as the pre-IWU value (PI). The highest of 9 subsequent efforts that followed 2 sets of 30 breaths at 40% PI was recorded as PI(max). Following 4 weeks of IMT, the trials were repeated. RESULTS: IWU increased PI by 11-17% (p < or = 0.01), irrespective of IMT status. After IWU, 5-6 efforts were required to determine PI(max), irrespective of IMT status. PI(max) was similar between the 2 trials before IMT and the 2 trials after IMT (p > or = 0.05), and was 21% higher after IMT (p < or = 0.01). The coefficient of variation was excellent before and after IWU, both before (1.9 and 0.6%, respectively) and after IMT (1.1 and 0.3%, respectively). Limits of agreement and sample sizes for effect sizes < or =10% were substantially smaller after IWU in all trials. CONCLUSIONS: (1) IWU enhances the between-day reliability of PI(max) measurement, and this is unaffected by IMT, and (2) judgements regarding acceptability in relation to PI(max) reliability should be made in relation to analytical goals and we present data to facilitate this.
Authors: Carolina Cirino; Claudio A Gobatto; Allan S Pinto; Ricardo S Torres; Charlini S Hartz; Paulo H S M Azevedo; Marlene A Moreno; Fúlvia B Manchado-Gobatto Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Kadja Benício; Vanessa R Resqueti; Fernando A L Dias; Francesca Pennati; Andrea Aliverti; Jéssica Danielle Medeiros da Fonseca; Guilherme A F Fregonezi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kadja Benício; Fernando A L Dias; Lucien P Gualdi; Andrea Aliverti; Vanessa R Resqueti; Guilherme A F Fregonezi Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Francesco Vincenzo Ferraro; James Peter Gavin; Thomas William Wainwright; Alison K McConnell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.240