Literature DB >> 19341921

Combined high tibial osteotomy decreases biomechanical changes radiologically detectable in the sagittal plane compared with closing-wedge osteotomy.

Miklós Papp1, László Szabó, István Lázár, István Takács, Zoltán Károlyi, Gergely G Nagy, György Vereb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized, prospective study was to compare radiologic changes in the sagittal plane after closing-wedge and combined high tibial osteotomies (HTOs) performed in patients with medial knee arthrosis associated with a varus deformity and requiring a 10 degrees correction.
METHODS: The patellar height, determined by the Insall-Salvati index (ISI), and tibial slope (TS) angle, measured by the Dejour-Bonnin method, were compared after 45 closing-wedge osteotomy (CWO) and 46 combined osteotomy (CO) procedures. CO is a relatively new technique effectively being the combination of closing-wedge and opening-wedge HTOs. It involves performing a proximal osteotomy parallel to the tibial plateau, followed by a distal osteotomy extending from the lateral part of the tibia to the line of the proximal osteotomy at the center of the tibial condyle. After closure of the lateral part of the osteotomy and consequent opening of the medial part, the removed lateral bone wedge is transferred to the gap on the medial side.
RESULTS: We found that at the end of the study, 12 months after the operation, CO resulted in significantly smaller changes in TS angle (4.7% v 38.2%) and ISI (2.2% v 5.7%) values than CWO.
CONCLUSIONS: The main conclusion of this study is that based on our radiologic findings, CO results in significantly smaller changes in TS angle and ISI values than CWO; therefore, CO is better at preserving the normal or near normal condition of the knee than CWO. Altogether, when a 10 degrees correction is required during HTO, we recommend choosing CO instead of CWO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341921     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  5 in total

1.  Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope.

Authors:  S Utzschneider; M Goettinger; P Weber; A Horng; C Glaser; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Reinoud W Brouwer; Maarten R Huizinga; Tijs Duivenvoorden; Tom M van Raaij; Arianne P Verhagen; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-13

Review 3.  Closing wedge osteotomy of the tibia and the femur in the treatment of gonarthrosis.

Authors:  Courtney Sherman; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  High tibial osteotomy: closed wedge versus combined wedge osteotomy.

Authors:  Maarten R Huizinga; Reinoud W Brouwer; Tom M van Raaij
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  High tibial valgus osteotomy: closing, opening or combined? Patellar height as a determining factor.

Authors:  Oliver Portner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.176

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.