BACKGROUND: The use of the laser as an auxiliary tool has refined the traditional technique for lipoplasty. During laser lipolysis, the interaction between the laser and the fat produced direct cellular destruction before the suction, reduced bleeding, and promoted skin tightening. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to perform a comparative histologic evaluation of laser lipolysis with the pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser versus a continuous 980-nm diode laser. METHODS: A pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG (Smart-Lipo; Deka, Italy) and a CW 980-nm diode laser (Pharaon, Osyris, France) were evaluated at different energy settings for lipolysis on the thighs of a fresh cadaver. The lasers were coupled to a 600-microm optical fiber inserted in a 1-mm diameter cannula. Biopsy specimens were taken on irradiated and non-irradiated areas. Hematoxylin-erythrosin-safran staining and immunostaining (anti-PS100 polyclonal antibody) were performed to identify fat tissue damage. RESULTS: In the absence of laser exposures (control specimens), cavities created by cannulation were seen; adipocytes were round in appearance and not deflated. At low energy settings, tumescent adipocytes were observed. At higher energy settings, cytoplasmic retraction, disruption of membranes, and heat-coagulated collagen fibers were noted; coagulated blood cells were also present. For the highest energy settings, carbonization of fat tissue involving fibers and membranes was clearly seen. For equivalent energy settings, 1064-nm and 980-nm wavelengths gave similar histologic results. CONCLUSIONS: Laser lipolysis is a relatively new technique that is still under development. Our histologic findings suggest several positive benefits of the laser, including skin retraction and a reduction in intraoperative bleeding. The interaction of the laser with the tissue is similar at 980 nm and 1064 nm with the same energy settings. Because higher volumes of fat are removed with higher total energy, a high-power 980-nm diode laser could offer an interesting alternative to the 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser.
BACKGROUND: The use of the laser as an auxiliary tool has refined the traditional technique for lipoplasty. During laser lipolysis, the interaction between the laser and the fat produced direct cellular destruction before the suction, reduced bleeding, and promoted skin tightening. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to perform a comparative histologic evaluation of laser lipolysis with the pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser versus a continuous 980-nm diode laser. METHODS: A pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG (Smart-Lipo; Deka, Italy) and a CW 980-nm diode laser (Pharaon, Osyris, France) were evaluated at different energy settings for lipolysis on the thighs of a fresh cadaver. The lasers were coupled to a 600-microm optical fiber inserted in a 1-mm diameter cannula. Biopsy specimens were taken on irradiated and non-irradiated areas. Hematoxylin-erythrosin-safran staining and immunostaining (anti-PS100 polyclonal antibody) were performed to identify fat tissue damage. RESULTS: In the absence of laser exposures (control specimens), cavities created by cannulation were seen; adipocytes were round in appearance and not deflated. At low energy settings, tumescent adipocytes were observed. At higher energy settings, cytoplasmic retraction, disruption of membranes, and heat-coagulated collagen fibers were noted; coagulated blood cells were also present. For the highest energy settings, carbonization of fat tissue involving fibers and membranes was clearly seen. For equivalent energy settings, 1064-nm and 980-nm wavelengths gave similar histologic results. CONCLUSIONS: Laser lipolysis is a relatively new technique that is still under development. Our histologic findings suggest several positive benefits of the laser, including skin retraction and a reduction in intraoperative bleeding. The interaction of the laser with the tissue is similar at 980 nm and 1064 nm with the same energy settings. Because higher volumes of fat are removed with higher total energy, a high-power 980-nm diode laser could offer an interesting alternative to the 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser.
Authors: Mehmet A Kosoglu; Robert L Hood; John H Rossmeisl; David C Grant; Yong Xu; John L Robertson; Marissa Nichole Rylander; Christopher G Rylander Journal: Lasers Surg Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.025
Authors: Mario A Trelles; Claudia van der Lugt; Serge Mordon; Adriana Ribé; Marwan Al-Zarouni Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2009-03-26 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Michael T Chung; Andrew S Zimmermann; Kevin J Paik; Shane D Morrison; Jeong S Hyun; David D Lo; Adrian McArdle; Daniel T Montoro; Graham G Walmsley; Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa; Michael Sorkin; Robert Rennert; Hsin-Han Chen; Andrew S Chung; Dean Vistnes; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: M A Trelles; S R Mordon; E Bonanad; J Moreno Moraga; A Heckmann; F Unglaub; N Betrouni; F M Leclère Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2012-02-19 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Michael T Chung; Kevin J Paik; David A Atashroo; Jeong S Hyun; Adrian McArdle; Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa; Elizabeth R Zielins; Ruth Tevlin; Chris Duldulao; Michael S Hu; Graham G Walmsley; Andreina Parisi-Amon; Arash Momeni; Joe R Rimsa; George W Commons; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 4.730