Literature DB >> 19341543

'Over-the-counter' genetic testing: what does it really mean for primary care?

Imran Rafi1, Nadeem Qureshi, Anneke Lucassen, Michael Modell, Frances Elmslie, Joe Kai, Maggie Kirk, Nigel Starey, Sheila Goff, Paul Brennan, Shirley Hodgson.   

Abstract

The publication of More Genes Direct by the Human Genetics Commission is a timely reminder of the potential impact that 'over-the-counter' genetic testing (that is, a direct genetic test without the need for a medical referral) may have on the NHS. This article considers the relevance of current genetic research on complex common diseases and how this might translate into risk estimates for developing conditions such as dementia, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. The implications for primary care include the need to understand the current limitations of genetic testing and its commercial application over the counter, and the importance of continuing to make risk assessments using family history. The authors recommend caution in the premature introduction of over-the-counter testing without a sound evidence base.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341543      PMCID: PMC2662103          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X395021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  10 in total

1.  "Genetic exceptionalism" in medicine: clarifying the differences between genetic and nongenetic tests.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Genetic test evaluation: information needs of clinicians, policy makers, and the public.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; David Atkins; Marta Gwinn; Alan Guttmacher; James Haddow; Joseph Lau; Glenn Palomaki; Nancy Press; C Sue Richards; Louise Wideroff; Georgia L Wiesner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Reconsidering the family history in primary care.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich; Wylie Burke; Caryl J Heaton; Susanne Haga; Linda Pinsky; M Priscilla Short; Louise Acheson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: the promise and the pitfalls.

Authors:  Caryn Lerman; Alexandra E Shields
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 5.  Gene-environment interactions in human diseases.

Authors:  David J Hunter
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  The use of meta-analysis risk estimates for candidate genes in combination to predict coronary heart disease risk.

Authors:  F Drenos; J C Whittaker; S E Humphries
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Defining purpose: a key step in genetic test evaluation.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Ronald L Zimmern; Mark Kroese
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Polygenes, risk prediction, and targeted prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Paul D P Pharoah; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton; Bruce A J Ponder
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Apolipoprotein E4 and coronary heart disease in middle-aged men who smoke: a prospective study.

Authors:  S E Humphries; P J Talmud; E Hawe; M Bolla; I N Day; G J Miller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-07-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Informing patients of familial diabetes mellitus risk: How do they respond? A cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Nadeem Qureshi; Joe Kai
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Genetic advances in medicine: has the promise been fulfilled in general practice?

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic cancer risk assessment in general practice: systematic review of tools available, clinician attitudes, and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Will Rh Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo B Middlemass; Momina F Yazdani; Joe Kai; Penelope J Standen; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  "Is it really worth it to get tested?": primary care patients' impressions of predictive SNP testing for colon cancer.

Authors:  Kara-Grace Leventhal; William Tuong; Beth N Peshkin; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Mary B Fishman; Susan Eggly; Kevin FitzGerald; Marc D Schwartz; Kristi D Graves
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Influence of family history on the willingness of outpatients to undergo genetic testing for salt-sensitive hypertension: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Taro Takeshima; Masanobu Okayama; Ryusuke Ae; Masanori Harada; Eiji Kajii
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Effects of disclosing hypothetical genetic test results for salt sensitivity on salt restriction behavior.

Authors:  Taro Takeshima; Masanobu Okayama; Masanori Harada; Ryusuke Ae; Eiji Kajii
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2013-05-14

8.  The implementation of pharmacogenomics into UK general practice: a qualitative study exploring barriers, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  I Rafi; I Crinson; M Dawes; D Rafi; M Pirmohamed; F M Walter
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-05-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.