T R Wilson1, Y F Birks, D J Alexander. 1. Department of Surgery, York Hospital, Wigginton Road, York YO31 8HE, UK. trwilson@doctors.org.uk
Abstract
AIM: Little is known about the factors that patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) consider as important in shaping their health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and whether these are adequately represented by currently used HrQoL instruments. The aim of this study was to determine which areas of HrQoL are important to patients with CRC and to establish whether these areas are represented by validated questionnaires. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients who were undergoing treatment or follow up for potentially curable CRC. The areas of HrQoL that were important to the patients were identified from the interview data using a qualitative thematic framework analysis. These themes were then compared with the item content of two CRC-specific HrQoL questionnaires, FACT-C and QLQ-C30/CR38. RESULTS: The interviews identified 10 themes considered by patients to be important determinants of their HrQoL. These comprised control, normality, fatigue, uncertainty, information, emotional support, self-image, coping, symptoms and emotionally challenging events. Both HrQoL instruments contained questions that concerned some of the themes identified, but none of the FACT-C scales and only three from QLQ-C30/CR38 produced scores from which clinicians could identify problems in these areas. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing areas of concern for patients may assist clinicians in improving HrQoL outcomes. However, validated instruments currently used in CRC provide little information with regard to these areas.
AIM: Little is known about the factors that patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) consider as important in shaping their health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and whether these are adequately represented by currently used HrQoL instruments. The aim of this study was to determine which areas of HrQoL are important to patients with CRC and to establish whether these areas are represented by validated questionnaires. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 patients who were undergoing treatment or follow up for potentially curable CRC. The areas of HrQoL that were important to the patients were identified from the interview data using a qualitative thematic framework analysis. These themes were then compared with the item content of two CRC-specific HrQoL questionnaires, FACT-C and QLQ-C30/CR38. RESULTS: The interviews identified 10 themes considered by patients to be important determinants of their HrQoL. These comprised control, normality, fatigue, uncertainty, information, emotional support, self-image, coping, symptoms and emotionally challenging events. Both HrQoL instruments contained questions that concerned some of the themes identified, but none of the FACT-C scales and only three from QLQ-C30/CR38 produced scores from which clinicians could identify problems in these areas. CONCLUSION: Identifying and addressing areas of concern for patients may assist clinicians in improving HrQoL outcomes. However, validated instruments currently used in CRC provide little information with regard to these areas.
Authors: César Hueso-Montoro; Candela Bonill-de-Las-Nieves; Miriam Celdrán-Mañas; Sandra Milena Hernández-Zambrano; Manuel Amezcua-Martínez; José Miguel Morales-Asencio Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2016-12-08
Authors: Christine L Paul; Emilie Cameron; Christopher Doran; David Hill; Finlay Macrae; Mariko L Carey; Rob W Sanson-Fisher Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-07-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mimi Ton; Nathaniel F Watson; Arthur Sillah; Rachel C Malen; Julia D Labadie; Adriana M Reedy; Stacey A Cohen; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Polly A Newcomb; Amanda I Phipps Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 6.639