Literature DB >> 19341351

Benefits of dispersed central-place foraging: an individual-based model of a polydomous ant colony.

Amelie Schmolke1.   

Abstract

Colonies of many ant species are not confined to a single nest but inhabit several dispersed nests, a colony organization referred to as polydomy. The benefits of polydomy are not well understood. It has been proposed that increased foraging efficiency promotes polydomy. In a spatially explicit individual-based model, I compare the foraging success of monodomous and polydomous colonies in environments with varying food distributions. Multiple nests increased the colony's foraging success if food sources were randomly scattered in the environment. Monodomous and polydomous colonies did not differ in foraging success if food sources were clustered in one or three locations. These results support the hypothesis that foraging success serves as a driver for polydomous colony organization. Because transport may occur between the dispersed nests of a polydomous colony, I tested the efficiency of a simple mechanism of food exchange between nests. This mechanism, as introduced previously in the literature, proves insufficient to equalize the level of food between nests. While the importance of transport between nests remains unclear, the model results indicate that polydomy may increase the foraging success of ant colonies and that this effect may be robust across a range of food distributions.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19341351     DOI: 10.1086/598493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  8 in total

Review 1.  Resilience in social insect infrastructure systems.

Authors:  Eliza J T Middleton; Tanya Latty
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Polydomy enhances foraging performance in ant colonies.

Authors:  N Stroeymeyt; P Joye; L Keller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Does cooperation mean kinship between spatially discrete ant nests?

Authors:  Duncan S Procter; Joan E Cottrell; Kevin Watts; Stuart W A'Hara; Michael Hofreiter; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Ecological consequences of colony structure in dynamic ant nest networks.

Authors:  Samuel Ellis; Daniel W Franks; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The costs and benefits of decentralization and centralization of ant colonies.

Authors:  Dominic D R Burns; Jon W Pitchford; Catherine L Parr; Daniel W Franks; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  The Rules of Aggression: How Genetic, Chemical and Spatial Factors Affect Intercolony Fights in a Dominant Species, the Mediterranean Acrobat Ant Crematogaster scutellaris.

Authors:  Filippo Frizzi; Claudio Ciofi; Leonardo Dapporto; Chiara Natali; Guido Chelazzi; Stefano Turillazzi; Giacomo Santini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Resource redistribution in polydomous ant nest networks: local or global?

Authors:  Samuel Ellis; Daniel W Franks; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Internest food sharing within wood ant colonies: resource redistribution behavior in a complex system.

Authors:  Samuel Ellis; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.671

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.