Literature DB >> 19340704

Women's perceptions about seeing the ultrasound picture before an abortion.

Ellen R Wiebe1, Lisa Adams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To gain a better understanding of women's perceptions and experiences of viewing the ultrasound (US) before an abortion.
METHODS: This mixed-methods study included questionnaires and interviews. Women presenting for medical and surgical abortion at two urban abortion clinics completed questionnaires asking if they wished to view the US image and those women who had done so answered questions about their perceptions. A randomly selected ten women were interviewed six weeks later about their perceptions. The interviews were audio-taped, transcribed and analysed for salient themes.
RESULTS: The 350 participants had a mean age of 27.6 years, 0.68 births, and were at a mean of 49.1 days gestation at the time of the procedure. Most women (254/350, 72.6%) chose to view the US and 179/219 (86.3%) found it a positive experience. Older women and those who had children were less likely to want to view the US image (p = 0.001). All ten interviewees recommended that this choice be offered to every woman and recommended more communication between care providers and patients at the time of the US. None of the women changed her mind about having the abortion after having seen the US.
CONCLUSIONS: Offering the choice to view the ultrasound is both feasible and beneficial to women having abortions. Our findings support those of the only other study published on the subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19340704     DOI: 10.1080/13625180902745130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  5 in total

1.  Re-visioning Ultrasound through Women's Accounts of Pre-abortion Care in England.

Authors:  Siân M Beynon-Jones
Journal:  Gend Soc       Date:  2015-10

2.  Experiences, feelings and thoughts of women undergoing second trimester medical termination of pregnancy.

Authors:  Inga-Maj Andersson; Kyllike Christensson; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Ushma D Upadhyay; Katrina Kimport; Elise K O Belusa; Nicole E Johns; Douglas W Laube; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Is the diagnostic radiological image an underutilised resource? Exploring the literature.

Authors:  William A S Cox; Penelope Cavenagh; Fernando Bello
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-02-06

5.  Viewing the image? Ultrasound examination during abortion preparations, ethical challenges.

Authors:  Marianne Kjelsvik; Ragnhild Jt Sekse; Elin M Aasen; Eva Gjengedal
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.874

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.