Literature DB >> 19340637

Are women at greater risk? An examination of alcohol-related consequences and gender.

Dawn E Sugarman1, Kelly S Demartini, Kate B Carey.   

Abstract

Men typically drink more than women; however, women achieve higher BACs (blood alcohol concentration) than men at equivalent consumption levels. This study investigated the unique effect of gender on individual alcohol problems by controlling both consumption and intoxication in a sample of 1,331 undergraduate drinkers. Gender independently influenced the risk of experiencing seven of nine negative consequences: (a) being female increased risk for tolerance, blacking out, passing out, drinking after promising not to, and getting injured; (b) being male increased risk for damaging property and going to school drunk. Gender patterns should be explored in a wider set of alcohol-related problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19340637      PMCID: PMC2951597          DOI: 10.1080/10550490902786991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Addict        ISSN: 1055-0496


  26 in total

1.  If you drink alcoholic beverages do so in moderation: what does this mean?

Authors:  M C Dufour
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Episode-centred analysis of drinking to intoxication in university students.

Authors:  Kypros Kypri; John Langley; Shaun Stephenson
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2005-07-04       Impact factor: 2.826

3.  Peak blood alcohol prediction: an empirical test of two computer models.

Authors:  B T Davies; C K Bowen
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2000-01

4.  Telescoping of drinking-related behaviors: gender, racial/ethnic, and age comparisons.

Authors:  Patrick B Johnson; Linda Richter; Herbert D Kleber; A Thomas McLellan; Deni Carise
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 5.  Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: changes from 1998 to 2001.

Authors:  Ralph Hingson; Timothy Heeren; Michael Winter; Henry Wechsler
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Brief motivational interventions for heavy college drinkers: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Michael P Carey; Stephen A Maisto; James M Henson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2006-10

7.  Is gender relevant only for problem alcohol behaviors? An examination of correlates of alcohol use among college students.

Authors:  Zaje A T Harrell; Nidal M Karim
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Changes in binge drinking and related problems among American college students between 1993 and 1997. Results of the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study.

Authors:  H Wechsler; G W Dowdall; G Maenner; J Gledhill-Hoyt; H Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  1998-09

9.  Association between alcohol intoxication and alcohol-related problems: an event-level analysis.

Authors:  Dan J Neal; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2007-06

Review 10.  Gender differences in moderate drinking effects.

Authors:  M S Mumenthaler; J L Taylor; R O'Hara; J A Yesavage
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  1999
View more
  22 in total

1.  Associations between AUDIT-C and mortality vary by age and sex.

Authors:  Alex H S Harris; Katharine A Bradley; Thomas Bowe; Patricia Henderson; Rudolf Moos
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Sex Differences in Substance Use Among Adult Emergency Department Patients: Prevalence, Severity, and Need for Intervention.

Authors:  Francesca L Beaudoin; Janette Baird; Tao Liu; Roland C Merchant
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Description and predictors of positive and negative alcohol-related consequences in the first year of college.

Authors:  Nancy P Barnett; Elise M Clerkin; Mark Wood; Peter M Monti; Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw; Donald Corriveau; Allan Fingeret; Christopher W Kahler
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  Modeling the severity of drinking consequences in first-year college women: an item response theory analysis of the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index.

Authors:  Amy M Cohn; Brett T Hagman; Fiona S Graff; Nora E Noel
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  Gender and depression moderate response to brief motivational intervention for alcohol misuse among college students.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Allecia E Reid; Michael P Carey; Kate B Carey
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2014-05-26

6.  Injunctive norms for alcohol-related consequences and protective behavioral strategies: effects of gender and year in school.

Authors:  Kelly S Demartini; Kate B Carey; Kristyn Lao; Matthew Luciano
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Sex differences in alcohol misuse and estimated blood alcohol concentrations among emergency department patients: implications for brief interventions.

Authors:  Alexis D Trillo; Roland C Merchant; Janette R Baird; Tao Liu; Ted D Nirenberg
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  [Commentary] Low-risk drinking limits: absolute versus relative risk.

Authors:  Deborah A Dawson
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Functional regulation of PI3K-associated signaling in the accumbens by binge alcohol drinking in male but not female mice.

Authors:  Debra K Cozzoli; Moriah N Kaufman; Michelle A Nipper; Joel G Hashimoto; Kristine M Wiren; Deborah A Finn
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  Effects of depressive symptoms and coping motives on naturalistic trends in negative and positive alcohol-related consequences.

Authors:  Shannon R Kenney; Jennifer E Merrill; Nancy P Barnett
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.