Literature DB >> 19340375

Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and rationale for robotic arm-assisted technology.

Jess H Lonner1.   

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective surgical treatment for focal arthritis when appropriate selection criteria are followed. Although results can be optimized with careful patient selection and use of a sound implant design, two of the most important determinants of UKA performance and durability are how well the bone is prepared and components aligned. Study results have shown that component malalignment by as little as 2 degrees may predispose to implant failure after UKA. Conventional cutting guides have been relatively inaccurate in determining alignment and preparing the bone surfaces for unicompartmental implants. Computer navigation has improved component alignment to an extent, but outliers still exist. The introduction of robotics capitalizes on the virtues of computer navigation but couples the planning and mapping of navigation with robotic techniques for bone preparation. Robotic technology is fostering substantially improved precision and component alignment in UKA, even when using minimally invasive soft-tissue approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19340375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  11 in total

1.  Effect of arthritis in other compartment after unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Bo Lu; Johannes F Plate; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-16

2.  Robotic unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a commentary on a recently published level 1 study.

Authors:  Alexander H Jinnah; Ashley Multani; Riyaz H Jinnah; Johannes F Plate
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

3.  [Digitalization and artificial intelligence in orthopedics and traumatology].

Authors:  K Harren; F Dittrich; F Reinecke; M Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Assessment of accuracy of robotically assisted unicompartmental arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Mofidi; Johannes F Plate; Bo Lu; Michael A Conditt; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Obesity has no effect on outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes F Plate; Marco A Augart; Thorsten M Seyler; Daniel N Bracey; Aneitra Hoggard; Michael Akbar; Riyaz H Jinnah; Gary G Poehling
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Advances in Patellofemoral Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sabrina M Strickland; Mackenzie L Bird; Alexander B Christ
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

7.  Decreased Time to Return to Work Using Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Conventional Techniques.

Authors:  Alexander H Jinnah; Marco A Augart; Daniel L Lara; Riyaz H Jinnah; Gary G Poehling; Chukwuweike U Gwam; Johannes F Plate
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2018-06-01

8.  Achieving accurate ligament balancing using robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes F Plate; Ali Mofidi; Sandeep Mannava; Beth P Smith; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Michael A Conditt; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-03-24

9.  Robotic assistance enables inexperienced surgeons to perform unicompartmental knee arthroplasties on dry bone models with accuracy superior to conventional methods.

Authors:  Monil Karia; Milad Masjedi; Barry Andrews; Zahra Jaffry; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-06-19

10.  Does Robotic-assisted TKA Result in Better Outcome Scores or Long-Term Survivorship Than Conventional TKA? A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Sung-Hwan Yoon; Jang-Won Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.