BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting coronary stent implantation emerged as a safe and effective therapeutic approach by preventing coronary restenosis and reducing the need for further revascularization. However, in contrast to bare metal stents, recent data suggest a unique underlying pathology, namely late coronary stent thrombosis and delayed endothelial healing. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of very late coronary stent thrombosis (834 days after implantation) requiring repeat urgent target-vessel revascularization. Importantly, six days before the acute coronary event, combined nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy was initiated. RESULTS: Although a dual antiplatelet regimen was continuously maintained, aggregation measurements indicated only partial antiplatelet effect, which returned to the expected range when nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were omitted. CONCLUSIONS: The observation indicates that, even 834 days after drug-eluting stent implantation, effective combined antiplatelet therapy might be crucial in certain individuals and the possible impact of drug interactions should not be underestimated. Further efforts should focus on the challenging task of identifying patients or medical situations with prolonged, increased risk of stent thrombosis.
BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting coronary stent implantation emerged as a safe and effective therapeutic approach by preventing coronary restenosis and reducing the need for further revascularization. However, in contrast to bare metal stents, recent data suggest a unique underlying pathology, namely late coronary stent thrombosis and delayed endothelial healing. OBJECTIVE: To report a case of very late coronary stent thrombosis (834 days after implantation) requiring repeat urgent target-vessel revascularization. Importantly, six days before the acute coronary event, combined nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy was initiated. RESULTS: Although a dual antiplatelet regimen was continuously maintained, aggregation measurements indicated only partial antiplatelet effect, which returned to the expected range when nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were omitted. CONCLUSIONS: The observation indicates that, even 834 days after drug-eluting stent implantation, effective combined antiplatelet therapy might be crucial in certain individuals and the possible impact of drug interactions should not be underestimated. Further efforts should focus on the challenging task of identifying patients or medical situations with prolonged, increased risk of stent thrombosis.
Authors: Thomas F Lüscher; Jan Steffel; Franz R Eberli; Michael Joner; Gaku Nakazawa; Felix C Tanner; Renu Virmani Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-02-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Machael P Love; Erick Schampaert; Eric A Cohen; John G Webb; Todd J Anderson; Marino Labinaz; Jean-François Tanguay; Vladimír Dzavík Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Sidney C Smith; Ted E Feldman; John W Hirshfeld; Alice K Jacobs; Morton J Kern; Spencer B King; Douglass A Morrison; William W O'Neil; Hartzell V Schaff; Patrick L Whitlow; David O Williams; Elliott M Antman; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon Ann Hunt; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eric L Eisenstein; Kevin J Anstrom; David F Kong; Linda K Shaw; Robert H Tuttle; Daniel B Mark; Judith M Kramer; Robert A Harrington; David B Matchar; David E Kandzari; Eric D Peterson; Kevin A Schulman; Robert M Califf Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-12-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gregg W Stone; Jeffrey W Moses; Stephen G Ellis; Joachim Schofer; Keith D Dawkins; Marie-Claude Morice; Antonio Colombo; Erick Schampaert; Eberhard Grube; Ajay J Kirtane; Donald E Cutlip; Martin Fahy; Stuart J Pocock; Roxana Mehran; Martin B Leon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-02-12 Impact factor: 91.245