Literature DB >> 19340118

Tissue drug concentration determines whether fluorescence or absorption measurements are more sensitive in diffuse optical tomography of exogenous contrast agents.

Scott C Davis1, Brian W Pogue, Hamid Dehghani, Keith D Paulsen.   

Abstract

The measurement sensitivities of absorbing and fluorescing objects in tissue are compared to determine conditions for which fluorescence data are favorable over those derived from absorption. A simulated human breast volume was used to model the relative perturbation in boundary data caused by a deeply embedded anomaly containing elevated concentrations of theoretical exogenous contrast agents with absorption properties resembling lutetium texaphyrin (LuTex) and Indocyanine Green (ICG). Synthetic data were used to produce quantum yield values representing the transition between conditions favorable to fluorescence versus absorption imaging. The parameters explored include tumor-to-background contrast, background drug concentration, and excitation light filtering efficiency. Drug concentration in the background was the primary factor that determined which contrast mechanism provided the more sensitive measurements. Specifically, fluorescence measurements are favorable if background drug concentrations are below 135-200 nM for LuTex and 25-50 nM for ICG, while absorption measurements are more sensitive above these ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19340118      PMCID: PMC2762213          DOI: 10.1364/ao.48.00d262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Opt        ISSN: 1559-128X            Impact factor:   1.980


  35 in total

1.  Fluorescence optical diffusion tomography.

Authors:  Adam B Milstein; Seungseok Oh; Kevin J Webb; Charles A Bouman; Quan Zhang; David A Boas; R P Millane
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  A submillimeter resolution fluorescence molecular imaging system for small animal imaging.

Authors:  Edward E Graves; Jorge Ripoll; Ralph Weissleder; Vasilis Ntziachristos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Three-dimensional, Bayesian image reconstruction from sparse and noisy data sets: near-infrared fluorescence tomography.

Authors:  Margaret J Eppstein; Daniel J Hawrysz; Anuradha Godavarty; Eva M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Diagnostic imaging of breast cancer using fluorescence-enhanced optical tomography: phantom studies.

Authors:  A Godavarty; A B Thompson; R Roy; M Gurfinkel; M J Eppstein; C Zhang; E M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Concurrent MRI and diffuse optical tomography of breast after indocyanine green enhancement.

Authors:  V Ntziachristos; A G Yodh; M Schnall; B Chance
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pharmacokinetics of ICG and HPPH-car for the detection of normal and tumor tissue using fluorescence, near-infrared reflectance imaging: a case study.

Authors:  M Gurfinkel; A B Thompson; W Ralston; T L Troy; A L Moore; T A Moore; J D Gust; D Tatman; J S Reynolds; B Muggenburg; K Nikula; R Pandey; R H Mayer; D J Hawrysz; E M Sevick-Muraca
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.421

7.  Time-dependent whole-body fluorescence tomography of probe bio-distributions in mice.

Authors:  Sachin Patwardhan; Sharon Bloch; Samuel Achilefu; Joseph Culver
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Visualization of antitumor treatment by means of fluorescence molecular tomography with an annexin V-Cy5.5 conjugate.

Authors:  Vasilis Ntziachristos; Eyk A Schellenberger; Jorge Ripoll; Doreen Yessayan; Edward Graves; Alexei Bogdanov; Lee Josephson; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Three-dimensional in vivo fluorescence diffuse optical tomography of breast cancer in humans.

Authors:  Alper Corlu; Regine Choe; Turgut Durduran; Mark A Rosen; Martin Schweiger; Simon R Arridge; Mitchell D Schnall; Arjun G Yodh
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  In vivo quantification of optical contrast agent dynamics in rat tumors by use of diffuse optical spectroscopy with magnetic resonance imaging coregistration.

Authors:  David J Cuccia; Frederic Bevilacqua; Anthony J Durkin; Sean Merritt; Bruce J Tromberg; Gultekin Gulsen; Hon Yu; Jun Wang; Orhan Nalcioglu
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 1.980

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Implicit and explicit prior information in near-infrared spectral imaging: accuracy, quantification and diagnostic value.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Scott C Davis; Frederic Leblond; Michael A Mastanduno; Hamid Dehghani; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Methods for detecting host genetic modifiers of tumor vascular function using dynamic near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Jaidip Jagtap; Gayatri Sharma; Abdul K Parchur; Venkateswara Gogineni; Carmen Bergom; Sarah White; Michael J Flister; Amit Joshi
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Collagen Complexity Spatially Defines Microregions of Total Tissue Pressure in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Michael D Nieskoski; Kayla Marra; Jason R Gunn; P Jack Hoopes; Marvin M Doyley; Tayyaba Hasan; B Stuart Trembly; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Oral Administration and Detection of a Near-Infrared Molecular Imaging Agent in an Orthotopic Mouse Model for Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Sumit Bhatnagar; Kirti Dhingra Verma; Yongjun Hu; Eshita Khera; Aaron Priluck; David E Smith; Greg M Thurber
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.939

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.