Isabelle Heard1. 1. Unité de Biologie de la Reproduction, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, France. isabelle.heard@psl.aphp.fr
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cervical cancer, caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV), is the only cancer that is almost preventable through regular screening. In high-resource, as in low-resource and middle-resource countries, women hit by the AIDS epidemic have a high prevalence of infection with HPV and related disease, including cervical cancer. The question whether cervical screening, which helped to reduce dramatically cervical cancer rates through the detection of precancerous lesions in the general population, is as efficient in the setting of HIV is still debated. RECENT FINDINGS: The risk for cervical cancer remained high and stable during the last decade in HIV-infected women, and incidence did not decrease with improving CD4 cell counts in women receiving antiviral therapy. Optimal methods to improve both the sensitivity and the specificity of cervical cancer screening are currently evaluated. The use of HPV DNA tests in primary screening endorsed in the general population may be less specific in immunocompromised women and might thus not be as efficient on screening. HPV vaccines, recently available, have no therapeutic effect and might thus not be very useful in preventing cervical cancer in a population highly infected with multiple and persistent HPV. SUMMARY: Cervical cancer prevention remains an important goal in HIV-infected women and specific guidelines are warranted for this increasing population.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cervical cancer, caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV), is the only cancer that is almost preventable through regular screening. In high-resource, as in low-resource and middle-resource countries, women hit by the AIDS epidemic have a high prevalence of infection with HPV and related disease, including cervical cancer. The question whether cervical screening, which helped to reduce dramatically cervical cancer rates through the detection of precancerous lesions in the general population, is as efficient in the setting of HIV is still debated. RECENT FINDINGS: The risk for cervical cancer remained high and stable during the last decade in HIV-infectedwomen, and incidence did not decrease with improving CD4 cell counts in women receiving antiviral therapy. Optimal methods to improve both the sensitivity and the specificity of cervical cancer screening are currently evaluated. The use of HPV DNA tests in primary screening endorsed in the general population may be less specific in immunocompromised women and might thus not be as efficient on screening. HPV vaccines, recently available, have no therapeutic effect and might thus not be very useful in preventing cervical cancer in a population highly infected with multiple and persistent HPV. SUMMARY:Cervical cancer prevention remains an important goal in HIV-infectedwomen and specific guidelines are warranted for this increasing population.
Authors: Satish Gopal; Chad J Achenbach; Elizabeth L Yanik; Dirk P Dittmer; Joseph J Eron; Eric A Engels Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lisa Wigfall; Wayne A Duffus; Lucy Annang; Donna L Richter; Myriam E Torres; Edith M Williams; Saundra H Glover Journal: J S C Med Assoc Date: 2009-12
Authors: Louise Kuhn; Rakiya Saidu; Rosalind Boa; Ana Tergas; Jennifer Moodley; David Persing; Scott Campbell; Wei-Yann Tsai; Thomas C Wright; Lynette Denny Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Marina Munoz; Milena Camargo; Sara C Soto-De Leon; Ricardo Sanchez; Diana Parra; Andrea C Pineda; Otto Sussmann; Antonio Perez-Prados; Manuel E Patarroyo; Manuel A Patarroyo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Valeria Stuardo; Cristina Agustí; José Manuel Godinez; Alexandra Montoliu; Aureli Torné; Antoni Tarrats; Carmen Alcalde; Dolores Martín; Eulalia Fernández-Montoli; Cristina Vanrell; Josefa Solé; Yolanda Canet; José Manuel Marqueta; Jadiyettu Mohamed; Isabel Cuenca; Montserrat Lonca; Guillem Sirera; Elena Ferrer; Pere Domingo; Belen Lloveras; Josep María Miro; Silvia De Sanjosé; Jordi Casabona Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240