Literature DB >> 19339783

Evaluation of potential power gain with imputed genotypes in genome-wide association studies.

Tim Becker1, Antonia Flaquer, Felix F Brockschmidt, Christine Herold, Michael Steffens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the beginning of the era of genome-wide association studies methods to obtain 'in silico' genotypes have gained importance. In this context, an evaluation of genome-wide power levels of current marker panels and the power gain achievable with imputed genotypes are of high interest.
METHODS: Power for single-marker analysis of imputed genotypes is evaluated via a simulation study based on HapMap data. Power values for genome-wide significance of marker panels of 1,000,000 SNPs are considered for small effect sizes typical of common diseases and large case-control samples. In order to evaluate the performance of imputing, we consider a method that is conceptually related to previous approaches. We introduce various modifications which together lead to an alternative implementation of the imputation idea. In particular, a Monte-Carlo (MC) simulation method for association testing of imputed markers is introduced.
RESULTS: We show that the incorporation of imputed genotypes can lead to a substantial power gain for common disease variants if the training sample is large enough. In addition, we show that the MC approach is valuable to for validating association results obtained with imputed genotypes. DISCUSSION: Our simulation study also shows that even denser marker panels than those currently available are needed when sample size is limited. We thus expect that full genome SNP panels will lead to the identification of additional disease variants in the future. Until then, it is desirable that large and ethnically matched training samples genotyped on dense marker panels are available in each country. (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19339783     DOI: 10.1159/000210446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  3 in total

1.  The relationship between imputation error and statistical power in genetic association studies in diverse populations.

Authors:  Lucy Huang; Chaolong Wang; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A coalescent model for genotype imputation.

Authors:  Ethan M Jewett; Matthew Zawistowski; Noah A Rosenberg; Sebastian Zöllner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  SNP imputation bias reduces effect size determination.

Authors:  Pouya Khankhanian; Lennox Din; Stacy J Caillier; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; Sergio E Baranzini
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 4.599

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.