BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ceropegia (Apocynaceae subfamily Asclepiadoideae) is a large, Old World genus of >180 species, all of which possess distinctive flask-shaped flowers that temporarily trap pollinators. The taxonomic diversity of pollinators, biogeographic and phylogenetic patterns of pollinator exploitation, and the level of specificity of interactions were assessed in order to begin to understand the role of pollinators in promoting diversification within the genus. METHODS: Flower visitor and pollinator data for approx. 60 Ceropegia taxa were analysed with reference to the main centres of diversity of the genus and to a cpDNA-nrDNA molecular phylogeny of the genus. KEY RESULTS: Ceropegia spp. interact with flower-visiting Diptera from at least 26 genera in 20 families, of which 11 genera and 11 families are pollinators. Size range of flies was 0.5-4.0 mm and approx. 94 % were females. Ceropegia from particular regions do not use specific fly genera or families, though Arabian Peninsula species are pollinated by a wider range of Diptera families than those in other regions. The basal-most clade interacts with the highest diversity of Diptera families and genera, largely due to one hyper-generalist taxon, C. aristolochioides subsp. deflersiana. Species in the more-derived clades interact with a smaller diversity of Diptera. Approximately 60 % of taxa are so far recorded as interacting with only a single genus of pollinators, the remaining 40 % being less conservative in their interactions. Ceropegia spp. can therefore be ecological specialists or generalists. CONCLUSIONS: The genus Ceropegia has largely radiated without evolutionary shifts in pollinator functional specialization, maintaining its interactions with small Diptera. Intriguing biogeographic and phylogenetic patterns may reflect processes of regional dispersal, diversification and subsequent specialization onto a narrower range of pollinators, though some of the findings may be caused by inconsistent sampling. Comparisons are made with other plant genera in the Aristolochiaceae and Araceae that have evolved flask-shaped flowers that trap female flies seeking oviposition sites.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ceropegia (Apocynaceae subfamily Asclepiadoideae) is a large, Old World genus of >180 species, all of which possess distinctive flask-shaped flowers that temporarily trap pollinators. The taxonomic diversity of pollinators, biogeographic and phylogenetic patterns of pollinator exploitation, and the level of specificity of interactions were assessed in order to begin to understand the role of pollinators in promoting diversification within the genus. METHODS: Flower visitor and pollinator data for approx. 60 Ceropegia taxa were analysed with reference to the main centres of diversity of the genus and to a cpDNA-nrDNA molecular phylogeny of the genus. KEY RESULTS: Ceropegia spp. interact with flower-visiting Diptera from at least 26 genera in 20 families, of which 11 genera and 11 families are pollinators. Size range of flies was 0.5-4.0 mm and approx. 94 % were females. Ceropegia from particular regions do not use specific fly genera or families, though Arabian Peninsula species are pollinated by a wider range of Diptera families than those in other regions. The basal-most clade interacts with the highest diversity of Diptera families and genera, largely due to one hyper-generalist taxon, C. aristolochioides subsp. deflersiana. Species in the more-derived clades interact with a smaller diversity of Diptera. Approximately 60 % of taxa are so far recorded as interacting with only a single genus of pollinators, the remaining 40 % being less conservative in their interactions. Ceropegia spp. can therefore be ecological specialists or generalists. CONCLUSIONS: The genus Ceropegia has largely radiated without evolutionary shifts in pollinator functional specialization, maintaining its interactions with small Diptera. Intriguing biogeographic and phylogenetic patterns may reflect processes of regional dispersal, diversification and subsequent specialization onto a narrower range of pollinators, though some of the findings may be caused by inconsistent sampling. Comparisons are made with other plant genera in the Aristolochiaceae and Araceae that have evolved flask-shaped flowers that trap female flies seeking oviposition sites.
Authors: Nina Rønsted; George D Weiblen; James M Cook; Nicolas Salamin; Carlos A Machado; Vincent Savolainen Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2005-12-22 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Amir Yassin; Nelly Gidaszewski; Béatrice Albert; Jean Hivert; Jean R David; Virginie Orgogozo; Vincent Debat Journal: Fly (Austin) Date: 2012 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.160
Authors: Jeff Ollerton; Sigrid Liede-Schumann; Mary E Endress; Ulrich Meve; André Rodrigo Rech; Adam Shuttleworth; Héctor A Keller; Mark Fishbein; Leonardo O Alvarado-Cárdenas; Felipe W Amorim; Peter Bernhardt; Ferhat Celep; Yolanda Chirango; Fidel Chiriboga-Arroyo; Laure Civeyrel; Andrea Cocucci; Louise Cranmer; Inara Carolina da Silva-Batista; Linde de Jager; Mariana Scaramussa Deprá; Arthur Domingos-Melo; Courtney Dvorsky; Kayna Agostini; Leandro Freitas; Maria Cristina Gaglianone; Leo Galetto; Mike Gilbert; Ixchel González-Ramírez; Pablo Gorostiague; David Goyder; Leandro Hachuy-Filho; Annemarie Heiduk; Aaron Howard; Gretchen Ionta; Sofia C Islas-Hernández; Steven D Johnson; Lize Joubert; Christopher N Kaiser-Bunbury; Susan Kephart; Aroonrat Kidyoo; Suzanne Koptur; Cristiana Koschnitzke; Ellen Lamborn; Tatyana Livshultz; Isabel Cristina Machado; Salvador Marino; Lumi Mema; Ko Mochizuki; Leonor Patrícia Cerdeira Morellato; Chediel K Mrisha; Evalyne W Muiruri; Naoyuki Nakahama; Viviany Teixeira Nascimento; Clive Nuttman; Paulo Eugenio Oliveira; Craig I Peter; Sachin Punekar; Nicole Rafferty; Alessandro Rapini; Zong-Xin Ren; Claudia I Rodríguez-Flores; Liliana Rosero; Shoko Sakai; Marlies Sazima; Sandy-Lynn Steenhuisen; Ching-Wen Tan; Carolina Torres; Kristian Trøjelsgaard; Atushi Ushimaru; Milene Faria Vieira; Ana Pía Wiemer; Tadashi Yamashiro; Tarcila Nadia; Joel Queiroz; Zelma Quirino Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Birgit Oelschlägel; Matthias Nuss; Michael von Tschirnhaus; Claudia Pätzold; Christoph Neinhuis; Stefan Dötterl; Stefan Wanke Journal: New Phytol Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 10.151