BACKGROUND: The Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) is conducting 2 randomized clinical trials, a daytime in-center trial ("daily") comparing 6 versus 3 treatments/wk, and a home nocturnal trial comparing 6 nocturnal treatments versus 3 conventional treatments/wk. The goal of this study was to project separation between the treatment and control arms of these studies for measures of dialysis dose by using simulations based on 2-compartment variable-volume models. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Data from the most recent hemodialysis treatment in 100 patients dialyzed 3 times/wk at facilities of the Renal Research Institute in New York and from 2 data sets (n = 154 and 115 patients) from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) trial. DESIGN: Observational study. PREDICTOR: Dialysis prescriptions for the treatment and control arms in the FHN trials. DIALYSIS REGIMEN OUTCOMES: Treatment time, ultrafiltration rate, standard Kt/V/wk for urea (stdKt/V(urea)), and continuous clearance estimates based on ratios of urea, creatinine, and normalized beta(2)-microglobulin generation rates (denoted by Gn) to time-averaged concentrations (TACs) of these solutes during 1 treatment week. RESULTS: The expected differences between median values in the experimental and control groups were weekly treatment time: daily trial, 29%; nocturnal trial, 234%; ultrafiltration rate: daily, -20%; nocturnal, -69%; stdKt/V(urea): daily, 52%; nocturnal, 133%; Gn(urea)/TAC(urea): daily, 34%; nocturnal, 130%; Gn(cr)/TAC(cr): daily, 31%; nocturnal, 135%; and Gn(beta2)/TAC(beta2): daily, 8%; nocturnal, 67%. LIMITATIONS: Use of simulated data and assumption of equivalent volumes and ultrafiltration rates between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The nocturnal 6-times-weekly regimen produces substantially greater separation between the treatment and control arms than the daytime 6-times-weekly regimen for a wide range of treatment parameters. However, the 6-times-weekly interventions in both FHN trials will produce substantially greater separation than in the HEMO trial, where separations in median weekly treatment time and stdKt/V(urea) between the 3-times-weekly high- and standard-dose groups were 18% and 17%, respectively. The FHN trials will test whether substantial increases in solute clearance and other effects of frequent hemodialysis materially influence selected intermediate outcome measures.
BACKGROUND: The Frequent Hemodialysis Network (FHN) is conducting 2 randomized clinical trials, a daytime in-center trial ("daily") comparing 6 versus 3 treatments/wk, and a home nocturnal trial comparing 6 nocturnal treatments versus 3 conventional treatments/wk. The goal of this study was to project separation between the treatment and control arms of these studies for measures of dialysis dose by using simulations based on 2-compartment variable-volume models. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Data from the most recent hemodialysis treatment in 100 patients dialyzed 3 times/wk at facilities of the Renal Research Institute in New York and from 2 data sets (n = 154 and 115 patients) from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) trial. DESIGN: Observational study. PREDICTOR: Dialysis prescriptions for the treatment and control arms in the FHN trials. DIALYSIS REGIMEN OUTCOMES: Treatment time, ultrafiltration rate, standard Kt/V/wk for urea (stdKt/V(urea)), and continuous clearance estimates based on ratios of urea, creatinine, and normalized beta(2)-microglobulin generation rates (denoted by Gn) to time-averaged concentrations (TACs) of these solutes during 1 treatment week. RESULTS: The expected differences between median values in the experimental and control groups were weekly treatment time: daily trial, 29%; nocturnal trial, 234%; ultrafiltration rate: daily, -20%; nocturnal, -69%; stdKt/V(urea): daily, 52%; nocturnal, 133%; Gn(urea)/TAC(urea): daily, 34%; nocturnal, 130%; Gn(cr)/TAC(cr): daily, 31%; nocturnal, 135%; and Gn(beta2)/TAC(beta2): daily, 8%; nocturnal, 67%. LIMITATIONS: Use of simulated data and assumption of equivalent volumes and ultrafiltration rates between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The nocturnal 6-times-weekly regimen produces substantially greater separation between the treatment and control arms than the daytime 6-times-weekly regimen for a wide range of treatment parameters. However, the 6-times-weekly interventions in both FHN trials will produce substantially greater separation than in the HEMO trial, where separations in median weekly treatment time and stdKt/V(urea) between the 3-times-weekly high- and standard-dose groups were 18% and 17%, respectively. The FHN trials will test whether substantial increases in solute clearance and other effects of frequent hemodialysis materially influence selected intermediate outcome measures.
Authors: John T Daugirdas; Glenn M Chertow; Brett Larive; Andreas Pierratos; Tom Greene; Juan Carlos Ayus; Cynthia A Kendrick; Sam H James; Brent W Miller; Gerald Schulman; Isidro B Salusky; Alan S Kliger Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Victor Gura; Matthew B Rivara; Scott Bieber; Raj Munshi; Nancy Colobong Smith; Lori Linke; John Kundzins; Masoud Beizai; Carlos Ezon; Larry Kessler; Jonathan Himmelfarb Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-06-02
Authors: Manjula Kurella Tamura; Brett Larive; Mark L Unruh; John B Stokes; Allen Nissenson; Ravindra L Mehta; Glenn M Chertow Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-06-24 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Christopher T Chan; Nathan W Levin; Glenn M Chertow; Brett Larive; Gerald Schulman; Peter Kotanko Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Mark Unruh; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Brett Larive; Anjay Rastogi; Sam James; Brigitte Schiller; Jennifer Gassman; Christopher Chan; Robert Lockridge; Alan Kliger Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2011-04-08 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Bessie A Young; Christopher Chan; Christopher Blagg; Robert Lockridge; Thomas Golper; Fred Finkelstein; Rachel Shaffer; Rajnish Mehrotra Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: John T Daugirdas; Tom Greene; Michael V Rocco; George A Kaysen; Thomas A Depner; Nathan W Levin; Glenn M Chertow; Daniel B Ornt; Jochen G Raimann; Brett Larive; Alan S Kliger Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2013-01-23 Impact factor: 10.612