BACKGROUND: Many procedures have been described in the search for the ideal mastopexy technique, ranging from simple cutaneous reduction, with or without glandular remodelling, to the use of dermal flaps fixed to the pectoral fascia, or even the use of silicone mesh or sheets. OBJECTIVE: We describe a technique that uses a dermoglandular hammock flap to achieve optimal position and shape of the breast; well located, good quality scars that are as short as possible; and satisfactory early- and long-term results. METHODS: A superior pedicle dermoglandular flap was raised from the lower pole of the breast and transposed to the upper pole. The flap is fixed like a hammock to the pectoral fascia and the wedge-shaped donor defect is closed by approximation and fixation of the medial and lateral pillars with absorbable sutures, thus releasing the tension in the skin suture line. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients aged 19 to 58 years underwent the procedure. Adequate shape and projection were achieved in all cases. Partial dehiscence of the suture line developed in 1 patient. The scar quality was excellent, except in 2 cases in which some degree of temporary hypertrophy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience with this technique, we obtained satisfactory position and shape; good quality, well-placed scars; long-lasting results; and preservation of the patient's ability to breast feed. The technique is simple to perform and is indicated in cases of moderate ptosis.
BACKGROUND: Many procedures have been described in the search for the ideal mastopexy technique, ranging from simple cutaneous reduction, with or without glandular remodelling, to the use of dermal flaps fixed to the pectoral fascia, or even the use of silicone mesh or sheets. OBJECTIVE: We describe a technique that uses a dermoglandular hammock flap to achieve optimal position and shape of the breast; well located, good quality scars that are as short as possible; and satisfactory early- and long-term results. METHODS: A superior pedicle dermoglandular flap was raised from the lower pole of the breast and transposed to the upper pole. The flap is fixed like a hammock to the pectoral fascia and the wedge-shaped donor defect is closed by approximation and fixation of the medial and lateral pillars with absorbable sutures, thus releasing the tension in the skin suture line. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients aged 19 to 58 years underwent the procedure. Adequate shape and projection were achieved in all cases. Partial dehiscence of the suture line developed in 1 patient. The scar quality was excellent, except in 2 cases in which some degree of temporary hypertrophy occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience with this technique, we obtained satisfactory position and shape; good quality, well-placed scars; long-lasting results; and preservation of the patient's ability to breast feed. The technique is simple to perform and is indicated in cases of moderate ptosis.