Literature DB >> 19337731

Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy.

Richard Nickinson1, Clare Darrah, Simon Donell.   

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy was undertaken to determine the accuracy of clinical diagnosis when compared with arthroscopic findings, and to see whether any specific pathologies were difficult to diagnose. The preoperative diagnosis was compared with the operative findings and the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the clinical diagnosis calculated. Six hundred ninety-eight patients were included. The overall accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of clinical diagnosis was 99%, 70% and 99%, respectively. Ninety percent of patients underwent a beneficial procedure, while 10% had a normal knee diagnosed at operation. Medial meniscal tear was the hardest pathology to diagnose with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity rates of 82%, 92% and 79%, respectively. Clinical examination remains an accurate method of assessing whether patients would benefit from an arthroscopy, although the correct diagnosis may not be determined preoperatively, particularly if pain was located in the medial tibio-femoral joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19337731      PMCID: PMC2899280          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-009-0760-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rob J P M Scholten; Wim Opstelten; Cees G van der Plas; Dick Bijl; Walter L J M Deville; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  The value of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Yavuz Kocabey; Onur Tetik; William M Isbell; O Ahmet Atay; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Physical examination tests for assessing a torn meniscus in the knee: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eric J Hegedus; Chad Cook; Victor Hasselblad; Adam Goode; Douglas C McCrory
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Accuracy of diagnoses from magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. A multi-center analysis of one thousand and fourteen patients.

Authors:  S P Fischer; J M Fox; W Del Pizzo; M J Friedman; S J Snyder; R D Ferkel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool for evaluation of traumatic knee injuries. Anatomical and pathoanatomical correlations.

Authors:  B R Mandelbaum; G A Finerman; M A Reicher; S Hartzman; L W Bassett; R H Gold; W Rauschning; F Dorey
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthroscopy of the knee.

Authors:  D W Polly; J J Callaghan; R A Sikes; J M McCabe; K McMahon; C G Savory
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The accuracy of clinical examination of injury of the knee joint.

Authors:  O Simonsen; J Jensen; P Mouritsen; J Lauritzen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Internal derangement of the knee: diagnosis by arthrography, arthroscopy, and arthrotomy.

Authors:  F H Selesnick; H B Noble; D C Bachman; F L Steinberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Arthroscopy and arthrography of the knee: a critical review.

Authors:  J Ireland; E L Trickey; D J Stoker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1980-02

10.  Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Stuart Brooks; Mamdouh Morgan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Arthroscopic surgery or exercise therapy for degenerative meniscal lesions: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  M Rotini; G Papalia; N Setaro; P Luciani; M Marinelli; N Specchia; A Gigante
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2022-09-03

2.  In-Office Needle Arthroscopy (IONA): may a traditionally orthopedic procedure enter the portfolio of interventional radiology?

Authors:  Francesco Arrigoni; Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni; Vittorio Calvisi; Carlo Masciocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-05-15       Impact factor: 6.313

3.  Indications requiring preoperative magnetic resonance imaging before knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Björn Peter Roßbach; Matthias Frank Pietschmann; Mehmet Fatih Gülecyüz; Thomas Richard Niethammer; Andreas Ficklscherer; Stefan Wild; Volkmar Jansson; Peter Ernst Müller
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.318

4.  How Accurate Are Patients at Diagnosing the Cause of Their Knee Pain With the Help of a Web-based Symptom Checker?

Authors:  Leslie J Bisson; Jorden T Komm; Geoffrey A Bernas; Marc S Fineberg; John M Marzo; Michael A Rauh; Robert J Smolinski; William M Wind
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-02-19

Review 5.  A Current Review of the Meniscus Imaging: Proposition of a Useful Tool for Its Radiologic Analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Lefevre; Jean Francois Naouri; Serge Herman; Antoine Gerometta; Shahnaz Klouche; Yoann Bohu
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-02-11

6.  Relationship between Clinical, MRI, and Arthroscopic Findings: A Guide to Correct Diagnosis of Meniscal Tears.

Authors:  P Antinolfi; R Crisitiani; F Manfreda; S Bruè; V Sarakatsianos; G Placella; M Bartoli; A Caraffa
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-08-24

7.  Diagnostic needle arthroscopy and the economics of improved diagnostic accuracy: a cost analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Voigt; Michael Mosier; Bryan Huber
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.561

8.  In-office diagnostic arthroscopy for knee and shoulder intra-articular injuries its potential impact on cost savings in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Voigt; Michael Mosier; Bryan Huber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.