| Literature DB >> 19337517 |
Meghan O'Grady Milbrath1, Yvan Wenger, Chiung-Wen Chang, Claude Emond, David Garabrant, Brenda W Gillespie, Olivier Jolliet.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this study we reviewed the half-life data in the literature for the 29 dioxin, furan, and polychlorinated biphenyl congeners named in the World Health Organization toxic equivalency factor scheme, with the aim of providing a reference value for the half-life of each congener in the human body and a method of half-life estimation that accounts for an individual's personal characteristics. DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: We compared data from >30 studies containing congener-specific elimination rates. Half-life data were extracted and compiled into a summary table. We then created a subset of these data based on defined exclusionary criteria. DATA SYNTHESIS: We defined values for each congener that approximate the half-life in an infant and in an adult. A linear interpolation of these values was used to examine the relationship between half-life and age, percent body fat, and absolute body fat. We developed predictive equations based on these relationships and adjustments for individual characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: elimination rate; half-life; pharmacokinetics; poly-chlorinated dibenzofurans; polychlorinated biphenyls; polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19337517 PMCID: PMC2661912 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Congener-specific half-lives [median (range) or parametric estimate] for dioxins from the literature.
| Study | TCDD | 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD | 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD | 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD | 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD | 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD | OctaCDD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.2 (2.5– | 15.7 (3.6– | 8.4 (1.4– | 13.1 (2.9– | 4.9 (2.0– | 3.7 (1.6–16.1) | 6.7 (1.8– | |
| 6.1 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 13.1 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 6.7 | |
| 9.2 (5.8–15.4) | 13.9 (9.9–23.1) | 13.9 (7.7–19.8) | 11.6 (4.3–23.1) | 7.7 (5–9.2) | 4.3 (2.9–5.8) | 8.7 (5.8–11.6) | |
| 1.5 | |||||||
| 2.9 | |||||||
| 3.5 | 3.2 | 5.7 | |||||
| 0.43 | 0.36 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.5 | |||
| 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.28 | 0.42 | |||
| 5.8 | |||||||
| 9.7 | |||||||
| 7.1 (5.8–9.6) | |||||||
| 11.3 (10.0–14.1) | |||||||
| 8.7 (8.0–9.5) | |||||||
| 7.6 (7.0–8.2) | |||||||
| 7.5 (4.5– | |||||||
| 1.6 | |||||||
| 3.2 | |||||||
| 0.34 (0.16– | |||||||
| 6.9 (4.15– | |||||||
| 7.8 | |||||||
| 0.4 | |||||||
| 5 | |||||||
| 6.7 (4.9–9.6) | 42 (29–60) | 5.8 (4.0–8.3) | 22 (18–26) | ||||
| 6.7 (3.3–14) | 6.6 (3.6–12) | 24 (12–50) | 9.2 (3.2–27) | 1.4 (0.7–3.0) | 5 (1.8–14) | ||
| 6.2 | 8.6 | 19 | 70 | 8.5 | 6.6 | 5.6 | |
| 7.8 | 11 | 12 | 12 | 6.8 | 8.8 | 5.7 | |
| 6.3 | 8.3 | 7.8 | 10 | 4.6 | 3.2 | 4.6 |
(Infinity) indicates that at least one person had an increase in serum concentrations between measurements.
Values that fit exclusionary criteria for the subset.
As reported in Ogura (2004).
Application of model in Ogura (2004).
Characteristics and study information for studies with congener-specific half-life data.
| Study | Age (years) | No. | Time from exposure (years) | Time of follow-up (years) | Cohort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32–79 (mean = 48.7) | 43 | 0–37 (mean 5.4) | 1–9 (mean 5.6) | Occupational | |
| 41–73 | 6 | — | 4–6 | Occupational | |
| 27, 30 | 2 | 0 | 3 | Poisoned Austrian women | |
| Child | 1 | — | 2.5 | Child (wood in home) | |
| Infant | 2 | 0 | 1 | Breast-fed infants | |
| Late 50s to early 60s | 1 | 2 | 3 | Occupational | |
| 42 | 1 | 0 | < 1 | Adult male volunteer | |
| 47 | 1 | — | 6 | Adult male volunteer | |
| — | 36 | > 10 | 5 | Ranch Hand | |
| 31.8–66 | 337 | > 10 | 5 | Ranch Hand | |
| 31.8–66 | 213 | 14.8 | 10.3 | Ranch Hand | |
| 31.8–66 | 97 | > 9.3 | 15 | Ranch Hand | |
| 18–38 | 97 | 9–33 | 15 | Ranch Hand | |
| 0.5–16.6 | 45 | 0 | 17 | Seveso | |
| > 18 | 45 | 0 | 17 | Seveso | |
| 16–71 | 35 | 0 | 0.27 | Seveso | |
| 16–71 | 54 | 3 | 13.35 | Seveso | |
| — | 27 | — | — | Seveso | |
| < 1 | 20 | 0 | < 1 | Infants | |
| 40 | — | — | — | Model based on infants | |
| 25 | 3 | 0.6 | 15 | Yu-Cheng | |
| — | 2–4 | — | Yu-Cheng | ||
| 17–69 | 19 | 1–14 | 8–9 | Yu-Cheng and Yusho | |
| 17, 25, 33 | 3 | 1–10 | 9 | Yu-Cheng (individual) | |
| — | 7 | 14 | 1 | Yu-Cheng and Yusho | |
| — | 17 | 0 | 1 | Yu-Cheng | |
| — | 20–24 | < 1 | 0.7–4.7 | Yu-Cheng | |
| 17–33 | 3 | 1 | 15 | Yu-Cheng | |
| — | 30 | < 1 | 1–2 | Yu-Cheng | |
| 18–80 | 8 | 1–14 | 15 | Yu-Cheng and Yusho | |
| 18–80 | 8 | 1–14 | 15–19 | Yu-Cheng and Yusho | |
| 31–51 | 5 | 14 | 16 | Yusho | |
| — | 5 | — | — | Yusho | |
| 33–69 | 16 | 14–22 | 8 | Yusho (five individuals) | |
| — | 39 | 1–26 | 7.7 | Occupational | |
| — | 1–10 | 1–6 | 11 | Occupational | |
| 50 | 1 | < 1 | < 1 | Male volunteer | |
| 2–6 | 4,5 | — | — | Children, contaminated material | |
| 45 | 18–165 | < 1 | 3.83 | Occupational | |
| 20–65 | 253 | — | — | General Japanese population | |
| 40–59 | 10 | — | — | General Japanese population | |
| — | — | — | — | General Dutch population | |
| — | — | — | — | General Dutch population | |
| 48.7 | — | — | — | Occupational |
, not available.
Modeled value.
Fecal clearance only.
Data accessed from Ogura (2004).
Data accessed from Flesch-Janys et al. (1996).
Age in 1982.
Age during tour of duty.
Also published by Ryan and Masuda (1991).
Data accessed from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2000).
Application of model presented to data from study in Chen et al. (1982).
Data accessed from Ryan et al. (1993).
Data accessed from abstract.
Reported two metabolic clearance rates, not apparent half-life values; clearance rates were assumed to be additive, and half-lives were calculated as follows: t1/2 = 1/k + 1/k.
Did not account for growth; may be near background.
Data accessed from Shirai and Kissel (1996).
Application of kinetic model to data.
Figure 1Range of half-life values (in years) for dioxins and furans based on a subset of values from the literature. Bars represent 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, and whiskers indicate the range. Diamonds indicate the reference values within this range, circles indicate outliers, and asterisks indicate extreme cases.
Figure 2Range of half-life values (in years) for PCBs based on a subset of values from the literature. Bars represent 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, and whiskers indicate the range. Diamonds indicate the reference values within this range, circles indicate outliers, and asterisks indicate extreme cases.
Congener-specific half-lives for PCBs from the literature.
| Study | PCB-77 | PCB-81 | PCB-126 | PCB-169 | PCB-105 | PCB-114 | PCB-118 | PCB-123 | PCB-156 | PCB-157 | PCB-167 | PCB-189 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.7 | 4.9 | |||||||||||
| 10.4 | 1.1 | 1.62 | ||||||||||
| 1.1 | 3.3 | |||||||||||
| 1.2 | 5.4 | |||||||||||
| 1.3 | 4 | |||||||||||
| 0.56 | 0.82 | |||||||||||
| 0.58 | 0.83 | ∞ | ||||||||||
| 0.51 | 0.77 | ∞ | ||||||||||
| 1.6 (1.5–1.9) | 5.3 (3.8–5.6) | |||||||||||
| 17.6 (6.9–33.7) | 13.2 (8.5–21.5) | |||||||||||
| 17.6 | 13.4 | |||||||||||
| 10.4 | ||||||||||||
| 3.9 | 5.8 | |||||||||||
| 5.02 | 11 | 7.0 | 31.7 | 10.8 | 15.3 | 100 | 20 | 35 | 166.7 | |||
| 0.5 | ||||||||||||
| 4.6 | ||||||||||||
| ∞ | 9.6 (7.4–23) | |||||||||||
| 1.6 (1.2–2.1) | 7.3 (5.2–10.4) | 2.4 (1.7–3.3) | 10 (7.4–14.2) | 3.8 (2.8–5.3) | 7.4 (5.3–10) | 16 (11–23) | 18 (13–26) | 12 (8.7–17) | 22 (16–32) | |||
| 0.1 | 0.7 (0.4–1.2) | 2.7 (1.6–4.5) | 13 (8.8–19) | 2.7 (1.5–4.8) | 25 (16–40) | 4.2 (2.3–7.5) | 12 (5.8–25) | 38 (23–63) | 27 (16–44) | 10 (5.2–19) | 41 (24–69) | |
| 0.1 | 2.7 |
Values shown are parametric estimates except where indicated. ∞ (Infinity) indicates that at least one person had an increase in serum concentrations between measurements.
Yu-Cheng.
Values that fit exclusionary criteria for the subset.
First and second samples from Chen al. (1982).
First and third samples from Chen al. (1982).
Yusho.
Figure 3Half-life of TCDD as a function of age.
Application of the model presented by Van der Molen et al. (2000) to the Flesch-Janys et al. (1996) data as done by Ogura (2004). Values from the current literature presented in Table 1. Linear interpolation between the infant and adult reference half-lives (slope and intercept given in Table 5).
Figure 6TCDD half-life as a function of total body fat. The two points shown in the square represent subjects whose half-lives were measured when they had serum concentrations well above the level of increased induction of degradation enzymes.
Application of the model presented by Van der Molen et al. (2000) to the Flesch-Janys et al. (1996) data as done by Ogura (2004). Values from the current literature presented in Table 1.
Figure 4Half-life of 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD as a function of age. Application of the equation proposed by Flesch-Janys et al. (1996) for ages > 60 years may be problematic because very small variations in the elimination rate could lead to substantial divergence in half-life length.
Application of the model presented by Van der Molen et al. (2000) to the Flesch-Janys et al. (1996) data as done by Ogura (2004). Values from the current literature presented in Table 1. Linear interpolation between the infant and adult reference half-lives (slope and intercept given in Table 5).
Figure 5TCDD half-life as a function of percent body fat. The oval indicates the area where the relationship of increased half-life with increased body fat does not hold; these values represent young subjects. Literature-reported data enclosed in squares indicate subjects whose half-lives were measured when they had serum concentrations that were well above the level of increased induction of degradation enzymes.
Application of the model presented by Van der Molen et al. (2000) to the Flesch-Janys et al. (1996) data as done by Ogura (2004). Values from the current literature presented in Table 1.
Reference half-lives (in years) and model parameters for Equations 2 and 3 for dioxins and furans.
| Infant half-life | Adult half-life | Median half-life | Reference adult age (years) | Source (adult values) | SF | Intercept ( | Slope ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCDD | 0.4 | 7.2 | 6.3 | 48.7 | 0.739 | 0.92 | 0.26 | 0.15 | |
| 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD | 0.3 | 11.2 | 8.5 | 48.7 | 0.683 | 1.21 | 0.09 | 0.23 | |
| 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD | 0.5 | 9.8 | 10.90 | 48.7 | 0.509 | 1.44 | 0.35 | 0.20 | |
| 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD | 0.4 | 13.1 | 12 | 48.7 | 0.635 | 1.32 | 0.12 | 0.27 | |
| 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD | 0.3 | 5.10 | 6.8 | 48.7 | 0.665 | 1.51 | 0.18 | 0.10 | |
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD | 0.3 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 48.7 | 0.525 | 1.87 | 0.22 | 0.10 | |
| OctaCDD | 0.5 | 6.7 | 5.7 | 48.7 | 0.551 | 3.3 | 0.33 | 0.14 | |
| 2,3,7,8-TCDF | 0.1 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 48.7 | 0.648 | 1.1 | 0.08 | 0.04 | |
| 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF | 0.2 | 3.50 | 1.9 | 48.7 | 0.648 | 1.6 | 0.13 | 0.07 | |
| 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF | 0.3 | 7.0 | 4.9 | 48.7 | 0.648 | 1.15 | 0.13 | 0.14 | |
| 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF | 0.4 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 48.7 | 0.692 | 1.79 | 0.23 | 0.13 | |
| 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF | 0.4 | 7.2 | 6 | 48.7 | 0.695 | 1.91 | 0.26 | 0.15 | |
| 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF | 0.4 | 7.2 | 40.0 | 0.648 | 1.39 | 0.19 | 0.15 | ||
| 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF | 0.2 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 48.7 | 0.648 | 1.38 | 0.10 | 0.06 | |
| 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF | 0.2 | 3.1 | 3 | 48.7 | 0.832 | 2.59 | 0.11 | 0.06 | |
| 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF | 0.3 | 4.6 | 5.2 | 48.7 | 0.648 | 4.28 | 0.17 | 0.09 | |
| OctaCDF | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 48.7 | 0.648 | 3.4 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
, not available. KBM, blood lipid to milk fat ratio; SF, smoking factor.
Infant reference values taken from Leung et al. (2006).
Flesch-Janys et al. (1996), median value.
Flesch-Janys et al. (1996), regression values.
Van der Molen et al. (2000).
No data for this congener (the half-life values were taken to be the same as 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF).
Geometric mean of all KBM values.
Reference half-lives (in years) and model parameters for Equations 2 and 3 for PCBs.
| PCB-77 | PCB-81 | PCB-126 | PCB-169 | PCB-105 | PCB-114 | PCB-118 | PCB-123 | PCB-156 | PCB-157 | PCB-167 | PCB-189 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infant reference half-life (years) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| Adult reference half-life (years) | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 7.3 | 2.4 | 10.0 | 3.8 | 7.4 | 16.0 | 18.0 | 12.0 | 22.0 |
| Median half-life | 0.1 | 0.73 | 2.7 | 10.4 | 2.4 | 25 | 1.6 | 12 | 5.35 | 20 | 12 | 41 |
| Reference adult age (years) | 49.5 | 49.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 | 42.5 |
| Source | ||||||||||||
| SF | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 | 0.648 |
| 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.67 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.52 | 1.16 | 1.26 | 1.19 | 1.99 | |
| Intercept (β0) | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.53 | 0.59 | 0.39 | 0.72 |
| Slope (βage) | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.28 | 0.51 |
KBM, blood lipid to milk fat ratio; SF, smoking factor.
Sources of adult reference values: Ogura (2004) blood data;
Ogura (2004) adipose tissue data.
Geometric mean of all KBM values.
Congener-specific half-lives for furans from the literature.
| Study | 2,3,7,8- TCDF | 1,2,3,7,8- PeCDF | 2,3,4,7,8- PeCDF | 1,2,3,4,7,8- HxCDF | 1,2,3,6,7,8- HxCDF | 2,3,4,6,7,8- HxCDF | 1,2,3,4,6,7,8- HpCDF | 1,2,3,4,7,8,9- HpCDF | OctaCDF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.6 (12.6–31.5) | 6.2 (1.9–∞) | 6 (2.1–∞) | 5.8 (3.1–19.8) | 3 (2.1–∞) | 3.2 (2.1–∞) | ||||
| 6.4 | 7.2 | 3.1 | |||||||
| 13.9 (4.6–23.1) | 8.7 (4.1–17.3) | 5.8 (3.6–9.2) | 9.9 (8.7–12.6) | 3.9 (2.5–4.6) | |||||
| 1.7 | 1.8 | ||||||||
| 0.23 | |||||||||
| 0.3 | |||||||||
| 4.7 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 6.5 | ||||||
| 7.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.1 | ||||||
| 4.5 | 4 | 4.9 | 6.8 | ||||||
| 3.1 | 3.3 | 2.4 | |||||||
| 1.7 (1.3–2.9) | 2.4 (2.1–5.1) | 2.4 (1.6–6.1) | |||||||
| 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.9 | |||||||
| 2.3 | 2.9 | 2 | |||||||
| 2.2 | 2.7 | 2.1 | |||||||
| 9.1 | 8.6 | ||||||||
| 2.9 (2.7–3.6) | 3.5 (2.7–3.6) | 2.5 (2.2–2.6) | |||||||
| 1.5 | 1.5 | ||||||||
| 1.1 | 2.3 | 1.5 | |||||||
| 7.5 | 5.9 | 3.6 | |||||||
| 1.1 | 2.3 | 1.5 | |||||||
| 7.2 | 5.7 | 3.5 | |||||||
| 7.7 (5.2–14.3) | 5.1 (3.9–6.9) | 3.5 (2.6–6.6) | |||||||
| 8.9 | 5.4 | 3.9 | |||||||
| 9.6 (5.7–36) | 7.8 (4.3–54) | ||||||||
| 4.9 (3.3–7.1) | 9.9 (6.6–15) | 17 (11–26) | 4.8 (3.2–7.2) | ||||||
| 0.2 (0.1–0.4) | 0.4 (0.2–1.0) | 5 (2.7–9.1) | 3.7 (1.3–10) | 5.8 (1.4–25) | 2.1 (0.8–5.8) | 1.4 (0.5–3.8) | 2.1 (0.7–6.2) | ||
| 0.4 | 0.9 | 9.9 | 5.7 | 6.2 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 0.2 | ||
| 1.4 | 2.9 | 10 | 7.7 | 24 | 3.6 | 5 | 10 | 0.7 | |
| 2.4 | 3.9 | 7.8 | 5.6 | 7.1 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 1.6 |
Values shown are parametric estimates except where indicated. ∞ (Infinity) indicates that at least one person had an increase in serum concentrations between measurements.
Values that fit exclusionary criteria for the subset.
Value not defined.
As reported in Ogura (2004).
Application of model in Ogura (2004).
Also reported a parametric estimate of 7.1 for 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF.