Literature DB >> 19337471

The comparison of central and mean true-net power (Pentacam) in calculating IOL-power after refractive surgery.

Jeong-Ho Yi1, Joo Youn Shin, Byoung Jin Ha, Sang Woo Kim, Beom Jin Cho, Eung Kweon Kim, Tae-im Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of central true net corneal power (cTNP) and mean true net corneal power (mTNP) of the Pentacam system to give a keratometry (K) reading for calculating IOL (intraocular lens) power in eyes following refractive surgery.
METHODS: Refraction, an automated K-reading (Km), cTNP and mTNP were measured for 15 eyes that required cataract surgery and had previously undergone refractive surgery. The difference between postoperative manifest refraction values and target refraction values calculated with the SRK/T formula using cTNP were compared with the one using mTNP.
RESULTS: The mean deviation from the desired post-cataract refractive outcome was 0.60 diopter (D)+/-0.47 (standard deviation) using cTNP; 0.75+/-0.54 using mTNP (p=0.386). The actual refraction was within +/-0.50D of the intended refraction for 60% (cTNP) and 33.3% (mTNP) of eyes, and within +/-1.00D for 93% (cTNP) and 66.7% (mTNP) of eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: Although not statistically significant, the cTNP showed better accuracy than mTNP to give a keratometry (K) reading for post-refractive surgery eyes requiring cataract surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal true net power; Intraocular lens implantation; Pentacam

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19337471      PMCID: PMC2655745          DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1011-8942


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of changes in manifest refraction and corneal power after photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  P Hugger; T Kohnen; F A La Rosa; J T Holladay; D D Koch
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Intraocular lens calculations status after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  B Seitz; A Langenbucher
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Refractive error in cataract surgery after previous refractive surgery.

Authors:  H Gimbel; R Sun; G B Kaye
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Simple regression formula for intraocular lens power adjustment in eyes requiring cataract surgery after excimer laser photoablation.

Authors:  Samuel Masket; Seth Everett Masket
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Accurate intraocular lens power calculation after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis, bypassing corneal power.

Authors:  Keith A Walter; Michael R Gagnon; Phillip C Hoopes; Paul J Dickinson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  B Seitz; A Langenbucher; N X Nguyen; M M Kus; M Küchle
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Response of the posterior corneal surface to laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.

Authors:  Michael D Twa; Cynthia Roberts; Ashraf M Mahmoud; John S Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Model for nonectatic increase in posterior corneal elevation after ablative procedures.

Authors:  Deborah M Grzybowski; Cynthia J Roberts; Ashraf M Mahmoud; John S Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness.

Authors:  Z Wang; J Chen; B Yang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery.

Authors:  B Seitz; A Langenbucher
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  2 in total

1.  Day to Day Clinically Relevant Corneal Elevation, Thickness, and Curvature Parameters Using the Orbscan II Scanning Slit Topographer and the Pentacam Scheimpflug Imaging Device.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Shiva Mehravaran
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01

2.  Visual Corneal Photomechanical Analysis Is Combined with the Pentacam Correlation Index for the Diagnosis of Cone Corneas at Different Stages of Progression.

Authors:  Qiong Cheng; Feng Zhang; Tixian Tian; Lan Wu; Linna Li; Meixia Chen; Ye Zhou
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.682

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.