Literature DB >> 19337136

Differences in curve behavior after fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with open triradiate cartilages.

Paul D Sponseller1, Randal Betz, Peter O Newton, Lawrence G Lenke, Tom Lowe, Alvin Crawford, Daniel Sucato, Barry Lonner, Michelle Marks, Tracey Bastrom.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of spinal fusion in patients with open triradiate cartilages (OTRC) and closed triradiate cartilages (CTRC). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with OTRC at the time of spinal fusion may be at increased risk of developing postoperative changes related to growth.
METHODS: From a database of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, we identified 44 patients with OTRC (mean age, 11.6 years) and 450 patients with CTRC (mean age, 15.6 years) and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients in both groups were treated with anterior-only, posterior-only, or combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion; none had all-pedicle screw posterior instrumentation.
RESULTS: In the OTRC group, anterior or posterior instrumentation, but not the combined approach, resulted in a significant mean late increase in the main curve (4.4 degrees and 7.3 degrees vs. 0 degrees , respectively; P = 0.002), an approach-related difference not seen in the CTRC group. Significantly more OTRC patients had proximal levels added on after surgery than did CTRC patients (18% vs. 8%, respectively; P = 0.02), and there was a trend toward this phenomenon distally (29% vs. 19%, respectively; P = 0.10). Proximal and distal junctional kyphosis was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Reoperation rate was 11% and 7% for OTRC and CTRC patients, respectively. For the selectively fused Lenke 1C curves in OTRC and CTRC patients, there was a trend in the uninstrumented lumbar curve toward a smaller lumbar curve before surgery (36 degrees and 41 degrees , respectively; P = 0.07) and a larger curve after surgery (27 degrees and 24 degrees , respectively; P = 0.07).
CONCLUSION: Patients with scoliosis and OTRC have a greater risk of adding-on proximally and of loss of correction with anterior-only instrumentation; they may also have less predictable lumbar correction from selective thoracic fusion. However, after combined surgery, they have results similar to those of more skeletally mature patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19337136     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819139ef

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

1.  Lowest instrumented vertebra selection in Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: what if we choose lumbar apical vertebra as distal fusion end?

Authors:  Yu Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Yanqun Zhang; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Extensive fusion for Lenke 3C and 6C scoliosis: a two year radiographic follow-up.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Yanqun Zhang; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Do Current Recommendations for Upper Instrumented Vertebra Predict Shoulder Imbalance? An Attempted Validation of Level Selection for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Benjamin T Bjerke; Zoe B Cheung; Grant D Shifflett; Sravisht Iyer; Peter B Derman; Matthew E Cunningham
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-06-27

4.  Very long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterior spinal fusion with pedicular screws for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Alice Darnis; Pierre Grobost; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-10-08

5.  Preventing Fusion Mass Shift Avoids Postoperative Distal Curve Adding-on in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Mauro Bruzzone; Hiroaki Matsumori; Kin-Cheung Mak; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Preoperative pelvic axial rotation: a possible predictor for postoperative coronal decompensation in thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Qiu; Zhi-Wei Wang; Yong Qiu; Wei-Jun Wang; Sai-Hu Mao; Ze-Zhang Zhu; Bang-ping Qian; Shou-Feng Wang; Feng Zhu; Jun Qiao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Recommendations for research studies on treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: Consensus 2014 between SOSORT and SRS non-operative management committee.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Timothy M Hresko; Joseph P O'Brien; Nigel Price
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-03-07

8.  Natural History of Postoperative Adding-On in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Are the Risk Factors for Progressive Adding-On?

Authors:  Xiaodong Qin; Chao Xia; Leilei Xu; Fei Sheng; Huang Yan; Yong Qiu; Zezhang Zhu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Selective Thoracic Fusion for King-Moe Type II/Lenke 1C Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comprehensive Review of Major Concerns.

Authors:  Masayuki Ishikawa; Makoto Nishiyama; Michihiro Kamata
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-10-10

10.  Selective Fusion in Lenke 1 B/C: Before or After Menarche?

Authors:  Nestor Ricardo Davies; Carlos Tello; Lucas Piantoni; Rodrigo Remondino; Eduardo Galaretto; Ida Alejandra Francheri Wilson; Victor Vasquez Rodriguez; Ernesto Bersusky; Mariano Noel
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.