Literature DB >> 19336569

Copy number alterations that predict metastatic capability of human breast cancer.

Yi Zhang1, John W M Martens, Jack X Yu, John Jiang, Anieta M Sieuwerts, Marcel Smid, Jan G M Klijn, Yixin Wang, John A Foekens.   

Abstract

We have analyzed the DNA copy numbers for over 100,000 single-nucleotide polymorphism loci across the human genome in genomic DNA from 313 lymph node-negative primary breast tumors for which genome-wide gene expression data were also available. Combining these two data sets allowed us to identify the genomic loci and their mapped genes, having high correlation with distant metastasis. An estimation of the likely response based on published predictive signatures was performed in the identified prognostic subgroups defined by gene expression and DNA copy number data. In the training set of 200 patients, we constructed an 81-gene prognostic copy number signature (CNS) that identified a subgroup of patients with increased probability of distant metastasis in the independent validation set of 113 patients [hazard ratio (HR), 2.8; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.4-5.6] and in an external data set of 116 patients (HR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.3-10.6). These high-risk patients constituted a subset of the high-risk patients predicted by our previously established 76-gene gene expression signature (GES). This very poor prognostic group identified by CNS and GES was putatively more resistant to preoperative paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide combination chemotherapy (P = 0.0048), particularly against the doxorubicin compound, while potentially benefiting from etoposide. Our study shows the feasibility of using copy number alterations to predict patient prognostic outcome. When combined with gene expression-based signatures for prognosis, the CNS refines risk classification and can help identify those breast cancer patients who have a significantly worse outlook in prognosis and a potential differential response to chemotherapeutic drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19336569     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  42 in total

1.  Lessons from a decade of integrating cancer copy number alterations with gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Norman Huang; Parantu K Shah; Cheng Li
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Precise inference of copy number alterations in tumor samples from SNP arrays.

Authors:  Gary K Chen; Xiao Chang; Christina Curtis; Kai Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Approaches to the discovery of pharmacogenomic markers in oncology: 2000-2010-2020.

Authors:  R Stephanie Huang; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 4.  Current analysis platforms and methods for detecting copy number variation.

Authors:  Wenli Li; Michael Olivier
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  A role for the transducer of the Hippo pathway, TAZ, in the development of aggressive types of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Laura Romero-Pérez; Pablo Garcia-Sanz; Alba Mota; Susanna Leskelä; Marta Hergueta-Redondo; Juan Díaz-Martín; M Angeles López-García; M Angeles Castilla; Angel Martínez-Ramírez; Robert A Soslow; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Gema Moreno-Bueno; Jose Palacios
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Molecular and translational advances in meningiomas.

Authors:  Suganth Suppiah; Farshad Nassiri; Wenya Linda Bi; Ian F Dunn; Clemens Oliver Hanemann; Craig M Horbinski; Rintaro Hashizume; Charles David James; Christian Mawrin; Houtan Noushmehr; Arie Perry; Felix Sahm; Andrew Sloan; Andreas Von Deimling; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Gelareh Zadeh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Semiparametric odds rate model for modeling short-term and long-term effects with application to a breast cancer genetic study.

Authors:  Mengdie Yuan; Guoqing Diao
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Association between acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous mutations and HER2/ER/PR status in breast cancer.

Authors:  Musaffe Tuna; Marcel Smid; Dakai Zhu; John W M Martens; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  MAL2 and tumor protein D52 (TPD52) are frequently overexpressed in ovarian carcinoma, but differentially associated with histological subtype and patient outcome.

Authors:  Jennifer A Byrne; Sanaz Maleki; Jayne R Hardy; Brian S Gloss; Rajmohan Murali; James P Scurry; Susan Fanayan; Catherine Emmanuel; Neville F Hacker; Robert L Sutherland; Anna Defazio; Philippa M O'Brien
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Severe ocular phenotypes in Rbp4-deficient mice in the C57BL/6 genetic background.

Authors:  Jingling Shen; Dan Shi; Tomohiro Suzuki; Zunping Xia; Hanli Zhang; Kimi Araki; Shigeharu Wakana; Naoki Takeda; Ken-Ichi Yamamura; Shoude Jin; Zhenghua Li
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 5.662

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.