Literature DB >> 19335769

Chromalveolates and the evolution of plastids by secondary endosymbiosis.

Patrick J Keeling1.   

Abstract

The establishment of a new plastid organelle by secondary endosymbiosis represents a series of events of massive complexity, and yet we know it has taken place multiple times because both green and red algae have been taken up by other eukaryotic lineages. Exactly how many times these events have succeeded, however, has been a matter of debate that significantly impacts how we view plastid evolution, protein targeting, and eukaryotic relationships. On the green side it is now largely accepted that two independent events led to plastids of euglenids and chlorarachniophytes. How many times red algae have been taken up is less clear, because there are many more lineages with red alga-derived plastids (cryptomonads, haptophytes, heterokonts, dinoflagellates and apicomplexa) and the relationships between these lineages are less clear. Ten years ago, Cavalier-Smith proposed that these plastids were all derived from a single endosymbiosis, an idea that was dubbed the chromalveolate hypothesis. No one observation has yet supported the chromalveolate hypothesis as a whole, but molecular data from plastid-encoded and plastid-targeted proteins have provided strong support for several components of the overall hypothesis, and evidence for cryptic plastids and new photosynthetic lineages (e.g. Chromera) have transformed our view of plastid distribution within the group. Collectively, these data are most easily reconciled with a single origin of the chromalveolate plastids, although the phylogeny of chromalveolate host lineages (and potentially Rhizaria) remain to be reconciled with this plastid data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19335769     DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00371.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol        ISSN: 1066-5234            Impact factor:   3.346


  60 in total

1.  The evolutionary history of haptophytes and cryptophytes: phylogenomic evidence for separate origins.

Authors:  Fabien Burki; Noriko Okamoto; Jean-François Pombert; Patrick J Keeling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The falsifiability of the models for the origin of eukaryotes.

Authors:  Matej Vesteg; Juraj Krajčovič
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Non-random sharing of Plantae genes.

Authors:  Cheong Xin Chan; Debashish Bhattacharya
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-05-01

4.  Evolutionary inheritance of elemental stoichiometry in phytoplankton.

Authors:  Antonietta Quigg; Andrew J Irwin; Zoe V Finkel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Rethinking plastid evolution.

Authors:  Michael W Gray
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Broadly sampled multigene analyses yield a well-resolved eukaryotic tree of life.

Authors:  Laura Wegener Parfrey; Jessica Grant; Yonas I Tekle; Erica Lasek-Nesselquist; Hilary G Morrison; Mitchell L Sogin; David J Patterson; Laura A Katz
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 7.  Structural and functional diversification of the light-harvesting complexes in photosynthetic eukaryotes.

Authors:  Jonathan A D Neilson; Dion G Durnford
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Evolution of the eukaryotic ARP2/3 activators of the WASP family: WASP, WAVE, WASH, and WHAMM, and the proposed new family members WAWH and WAML.

Authors:  Martin Kollmar; Dawid Lbik; Stefanie Enge
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-02-08

9.  Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree.

Authors:  Thomas Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  ANALYSIS OF ALEXANDRIUM TAMARENSE (DINOPHYCEAE) GENES REVEALS THE COMPLEX EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF A MICROBIAL EUKARYOTE().

Authors:  Cheong Xin Chan; Marcelo B Soares; Maria F Bonaldo; Jennifer H Wisecaver; Jeremiah D Hackett; Donald M Anderson; Deana L Erdner; Debashish Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Phycol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.