Literature DB >> 19335599

Gender, socioeconomic status, need or access? Differences in statin prescribing across urban, rural and remote Australia.

Nigel Stocks1, Phil Ryan, James Allan, Susan Williams, Kristyn Willson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess differences in statin prescribing across Australia by geographic area. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study using Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data on statin prescribing by rurality, gender and patient postcode for the period May to December 2002. Participants were the Australian population, stratified by gender, quintile of index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage and rural, remote and metropolitan areas classification.
RESULTS: Statin prescribing (scripts per 1000 population per month) was higher in urban areas (women, 51.915; men, 51.892) than in rural (women, 48.311; men, 48.098) or remote (women, 39.679; men, 34.145) areas. In urban areas, weighted least squares regression analysis showed a significant negative linear association between statin prescribing and socioeconomic status for both women (weighted least squares slope, -3.358; standard error (SE) 0.057; P < 0.0001) and men (slope, -0.507; SE 0.056; P < 0.0001). A similar association occurred in rural areas: women (slope, -4.075; SE 0.122; P < 0.0001) and men (slope, -3.455; SE 0.117; P < 0.0001), but not in remote areas where there was a positive linear association (slope, 3.120; SE 0.451; P < 0.0001) and men (slope, 3.098; SE 0.346; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest differences in statin prescribing in Australia across geographic location, adjusting for age, gender and socioeconomic status. IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that health inequalities due to geography should be addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19335599     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.2009.01043.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Rural Health        ISSN: 1038-5282            Impact factor:   1.662


  5 in total

1.  A case study of the counterpart technical support policy to improve rural health services in Beijing.

Authors:  Weiyan Jian; Kit Yee Chan; Shunv Tang; Daniel D Reidpath
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Geographic variation in cardiometabolic risk distribution: A cross-sectional study of 256,525 adult residents in the Illawarra-Shoalhaven region of the NSW, Australia.

Authors:  Renin Toms; Darren J Mayne; Xiaoqi Feng; Andrew Bonney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The association of socioeconomic disadvantage and remoteness with receipt of type 2 diabetes medications in Australia: a nationwide registry study.

Authors:  Jedidiah I Morton; Jenni Ilomӓki; Dianna J Magliano; Jonathan E Shaw
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Variations in statin prescribing for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Robert Fleetcroft; Peter Schofield; Mark Ashworth
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Is health impact assessment useful in the context of trade negotiations? A case study of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.

Authors:  Katherine Hirono; Fiona Haigh; Deborah Gleeson; Patrick Harris; Anne Marie Thow; Sharon Friel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.