Literature DB >> 19335390

Hyperfrontality in patients with schizophrenia during saccade and antisaccade tasks: a study with fMRI.

Mai Fukumoto-Motoshita1, Masato Matsuura, Tatsunobu Ohkubo, Hiromi Ohkubo, Noriko Kanaka, Eisuke Matsushima, Masato Taira, Takuya Kojima, Tetsuya Matsuda.   

Abstract

AIMS: Antisaccadic eye movements, requiring inhibition of a saccade toward a briefly appearing peripheral target, are known to be impaired in schizophrenia. Previous neuroimaging studies have indicated that patients with schizophrenia show diminished activations in the frontal cortex and basal ganglia. These studies used target fixation as a baseline condition. However, if the levels of brain activities at baseline are not compatible between patients and healthy subjects, between-group comparison on antisaccade-related activations is consequently invalidated. One possibility is that patients with schizophrenia may present with greater activation during fixation than healthy subjects. In order to examine this possibility, here we investigated brain activities associated with antisaccade in the two groups without using target fixation at baseline.
METHODS: Functional brain images were acquired during prosaccades and antisaccades in 18 healthy subjects and 18 schizophrenia patients using a box-car functional magnetic resonance imaging design. Eye movements were measured during scanning.
RESULTS: In the patient group, the elevated activities in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and thalamus, normally seen in antisaccade tasks relative to saccade tasks, were no longer observed. Moreover, in normal subjects, activities in the DLPFC and thalamus were greater during the antisaccade task than during the saccade task. In patients, no such difference was observed between the two tasks, suggesting that these brain regions are likely to be highly activated even by a simple task such as fixation. In particular, the DLPFC and thalamus in patients were not activated at a level commensurate with the difficulty of the tasks presented.
CONCLUSIONS: From these results, it is suggested that schizophrenia entails dysfunctions in the fronto-striato-thalamo-cortical network associated with motor function control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19335390     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.01941.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 1323-1316            Impact factor:   5.188


  9 in total

1.  Alterations in intrinsic fronto-thalamo-parietal connectivity are associated with cognitive control deficits in psychotic disorders.

Authors:  Rebekka Lencer; Li Yao; James L Reilly; Sarah K Keedy; Jennifer E McDowell; Matcheri S Keshavan; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Elliot S Gershon; Brett A Clementz; Su Lui; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Robust differences in antisaccade performance exist between COGS schizophrenia cases and controls regardless of recruitment strategies.

Authors:  Allen D Radant; Steven P Millard; David L Braff; Monica E Calkins; Dorcas J Dobie; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Tiffany A Greenwood; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Laura C Lazzeroni; Gregory A Light; Sean P Meichle; Keith H Nuechterlein; Ann Olincy; Larry J Seidman; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Catherine A Sugar; Ming T Tsuang; Bruce I Turetsky; Debby W Tsuang
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  A thalamo-hippocampal-ventral tegmental area loop may produce the positive feedback that underlies the psychotic break in schizophrenia.

Authors:  John E Lisman; Hyun Jae Pi; Yuchun Zhang; Nonna A Otmakhova
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  Anti-saccade error rates as a measure of attentional bias in cocaine dependent subjects.

Authors:  Nadeeka R Dias; Joy M Schmitz; Nuvan Rathnayaka; Stuart D Red; Anne B Sereno; F Gerard Moeller; Scott D Lane
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Abnormal mechanisms of antisaccade generation in schizophrenia patients and unaffected biological relatives of schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  Seung Suk Kang; Daphne P Dionisio; Scott R Sponheim
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 6.  Electrophysiological Endophenotypes for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emily M Owens; Peter Bachman; David C Glahn; Carrie E Bearden
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Effects of ketamine on brain function during response inhibition.

Authors:  M Steffens; C Neumann; A-M Kasparbauer; B Becker; B Weber; M A Mehta; R Hurlemann; U Ettinger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Different involvement of subregions within dorsal premotor and medial frontal cortex for pro- and antisaccades.

Authors:  Edna C Cieslik; Isabelle Seidler; Angela R Laird; Peter T Fox; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Quantitative meta-analysis of fMRI and PET studies reveals consistent activation in fronto-striatal-parietal regions and cerebellum during antisaccades and prosaccades.

Authors:  Sharna D Jamadar; Joanne Fielding; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.