Ranju Singh1, Pushpinder Singh, Homay Vajifdar. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, Lady Hardinge Medical College & Associated Smt Sucheta Kriplani & Kalawati Saran Children's Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Truview EVO2 laryngoscope is a recently introduced device with a unique blade that provides a wide and magnified laryngeal view at 46 degrees anterior refracted angle. An infant blade of the laryngoscope has recently become available. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the Truview infant EVO2 laryngoscope with the Miller straight blade laryngoscope in order to determine whether the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope provided an improved laryngeal view at laryngoscopy and also to assess the time taken for intubation with the two devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, 60 neonates and infants of either sex undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and divided into two groups: endotracheal intubation using a Truview infant blade (Group I) or with a Miller blade number 0 (Group II). The view of the glottis at laryngoscopy, time to intubation and the number of attempts required for intubation were recorded. RESULTS: The average time for laryngoscopy in Group I was 18.18 s and in Group II was 16.30 s, which though not significant clinically, is statistically significant (P = 0.002). While eight patients (26.6%) had Cormack and Lehane grade 2 view on laryngoscopy in Group II, only two patients (6.6%) had such a view in Group 1 (P = 0.039). The number of attempts at laryngoscopy was comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that in neonates and infants, the tracheal intubation using Truview infant EVO2 blade took almost as much time as miller blade and provided improved laryngoscopic view as compared to the Miller blade.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Truview EVO2 laryngoscope is a recently introduced device with a unique blade that provides a wide and magnified laryngeal view at 46 degrees anterior refracted angle. An infant blade of the laryngoscope has recently become available. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to compare the Truview infantEVO2 laryngoscope with the Miller straight blade laryngoscope in order to determine whether the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope provided an improved laryngeal view at laryngoscopy and also to assess the time taken for intubation with the two devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, 60 neonates and infants of either sex undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and divided into two groups: endotracheal intubation using a Truview infant blade (Group I) or with a Miller blade number 0 (Group II). The view of the glottis at laryngoscopy, time to intubation and the number of attempts required for intubation were recorded. RESULTS: The average time for laryngoscopy in Group I was 18.18 s and in Group II was 16.30 s, which though not significant clinically, is statistically significant (P = 0.002). While eight patients (26.6%) had Cormack and Lehane grade 2 view on laryngoscopy in Group II, only two patients (6.6%) had such a view in Group 1 (P = 0.039). The number of attempts at laryngoscopy was comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that in neonates and infants, the tracheal intubation using Truview infantEVO2 blade took almost as much time as miller blade and provided improved laryngoscopic view as compared to the Miller blade.
Authors: Ibtihal S Abdelgadir; Robert S Phillips; Davinder Singh; Michael P Moncreiff; Joanne L Lumsden Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-05-24