Literature DB >> 19335338

Incremental prognostic value of combining left ventricular lead position and systolic dyssynchrony in predicting long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Qing Zhang1, Gabriel W-K Yip, Yat-Sun Chan, Jeffrey W-H Fung, Winnie Chan, Yat-Yin Lam, Cheuk-Man Yu.   

Abstract

The efficacy of CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy) can be affected by a number of factors; however, the prognostic significance of the LV (left ventricular) lead position has not been explored. The aim of the present study was to examine whether a PL (posterolateral) lead position has an additional value to systolic dyssynchrony in predicting a better survival after CRT. Patients (n=134) who received CRT were followed-up for 39+/-24 months. The LV lead position was determined by cine fluoroscopy, and baseline dyssynchrony was assessed by TDI (tissue Doppler imaging). The relationship between the LV lead position/dyssynchrony and mortality was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, followed by Cox regression analysis. The all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities were 38 and 31% respectively. The presence of dyssynchrony and a PL lead position predicted a lower all-cause mortality (29 compared with 47%; log-rank chi2=5.38, P=0.02) and cardiovascular mortality (21 compared with 41%; log-rank chi2=6.75, P=0.009) than when absent. The all-cause mortality was as high as 62% when patients had neither dyssynchrony nor a PL lead position, but was reduced to 29% when both criteria were present, and was between 45 and 46% when only one criterion was present (chi2=6.79, P=0.01). The corresponding values for cardiovascular mortality were 62% when patients had neither dyssynchrony nor a PL lead position, 36-38% when patients had either dyssynchrony or a PL lead position, and 21% when patients had both criteria present (chi2=9.54, P=0.004). Combining dyssynchrony and a PL lead position independently predicted a lower all-cause morality {HR (hazard ratio), 0.496 [95% CI (confidence interval), 0.278-0.888]; P=0.018} and cardiovascular mortality [HR, 0.442 (95% CI, 0.232-0.844); P=0.013]. In conclusion, the placement of the LV lead at a PL position provides additional value to baseline dyssynchrony in predicting a lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality during long-term follow-up after CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19335338     DOI: 10.1042/CS20080580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  4 in total

Review 1.  Sex differences in device therapy for heart failure: utilization, outcomes, and adverse events.

Authors:  Naomi D Herz; Joseph Engeda; Robbert Zusterzeel; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; David G Strauss; Samantha B Jacobs; Kimberly A Selzman; Ileana L Piña; Daniel A Caños
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  LV Dyssynchrony Assessed With Phase Analysis on Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT Can Predict Response to CRT in Patients With End-Stage Heart Failure.

Authors:  Nasrin Azizian; Fereydoon Rastgou; Tahereh Ghaedian; Allahyar Golabchi; Behdad Bahadorian; Vida Khanlarzadeh; Zahra Azizian; Majid Haghjoo
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-11-25

3.  Sex-specific mortality differences in heart failure patients with ischemia receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Zhonglin Han; Zheng Chen; Rongfang Lan; Wencheng Di; Xiaohong Li; Hongsong Yu; Wenqing Ji; Xinlin Zhang; Biao Xu; Wei Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Clinical implication of mechanical dyssynchrony in heart failure.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-09-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.