Literature DB >> 19334004

The genome-centric concept: resynthesis of evolutionary theory.

Henry H Q Heng1.   

Abstract

Modern biology has been heavily influenced by the gene-centric concept. Paradoxically, this very concept--on which bioresearch is based--is challenged by the success of gene-based research in terms of explaining evolutionary theory. To overcome this major roadblock, it is essential to establish new theories, to not only solve the key puzzles presented by the gene-centric concept, but also to provide a conceptual framework that allows the field to grow. This paper discusses a number of paradoxes and illustrates how they can be addressed by the genome-centric concept in order to further resynthesize evolutionary theory. In particular, methodological breakthroughs that analyze genome evolution are discussed. The multiple interactions among different levels of a complex system provide the key to understanding the relationship between self-organization and natural selection. Darwinian natural selection applies to the biological level due to its unique genetic and heterogeneous features, but does not simply or directly apply to either the lower non-living level or higher intellectual society level. At the complex bio-system level, the genome context (the entire package of genes and their genomic physical relationship or genomic topology), not the individual genes, defines the system and serves as the principle selection platform for evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19334004     DOI: 10.1002/bies.200800182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  22 in total

Review 1.  Noise-driven heterogeneity in the rate of genetic-variant generation as a basis for evolvability.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Capp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Unstable genomes elevate transcriptome dynamics.

Authors:  Joshua B Stevens; Guo Liu; Batoul Y Abdallah; Steven D Horne; Karen J Ye; Steven W Bremer; Christine J Ye; Stephen A Krawetz; Henry H Heng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Single cell heterogeneity: why unstable genomes are incompatible with average profiles.

Authors:  Batoul Y Abdallah; Steven D Horne; Joshua B Stevens; Guo Liu; Andrew Y Ying; Barbara Vanderhyden; Stephen A Krawetz; Root Gorelick; Henry Hq Heng
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  The life cycle of polyploid giant cancer cells and dormancy in cancer: Opportunities for novel therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Jinsong Liu; Na Niu; Xiaoran Li; Xudong Zhang; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 15.707

5.  Chromosome-wide gene dosage rebalance may benefit tumor progression.

Authors:  Honglei Zhang; Xing Yang; Xu Feng; Haibo Xu; Qin Yang; Li Zou; Mei Yan; Dequan Liu; Xiaosan Su; Baowei Jiao
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Comparison of mitotic cell death by chromosome fragmentation to premature chromosome condensation.

Authors:  Joshua B Stevens; Batoul Y Abdallah; Sarah M Regan; Guo Liu; Steven W Bremer; Christine J Ye; Henry H Heng
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 7.  Fertilization in flowering plants: an odyssey of sperm cell delivery.

Authors:  Prakash B Adhikari; Xiaoyan Liu; Xiaoyan Wu; Shaowei Zhu; Ryushiro D Kasahara
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Karyotypic determinants of chromosome instability in aneuploid budding yeast.

Authors:  Jin Zhu; Norman Pavelka; William D Bradford; Giulia Rancati; Rong Li
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Diverse system stresses: common mechanisms of chromosome fragmentation.

Authors:  J B Stevens; B Y Abdallah; G Liu; C J Ye; S D Horne; G Wang; S Savasan; M Shekhar; S A Krawetz; M Hüttemann; M A Tainsky; G S Wu; Y Xie; K Zhang; H H Q Heng
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.469

10.  Cellular exposure to muscle relaxants and propofol could lead to genomic instability in vitro.

Authors:  Allen Edward Coleman; Nicole McNeil; Alexander Leonidovich Kovalchuck; Dara Wangsa; Thomas Ried; Hong Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.