Literature DB >> 19333363

Adaptive dynamics of regulatory networks: size matters.

Dirk Repsilber1, Thomas Martinetz, Mats Björklund.   

Abstract

To accomplish adaptability, all living organisms are constructed of regulatory networks on different levels which are capable to differentially respond to a variety of environmental inputs. Structure of regulatory networks determines their phenotypical plasticity, that is, the degree of detail and appropriateness of regulatory replies to environmental or developmental challenges. This regulatory network structure is encoded within the genotype. Our conceptual simulation study investigates how network structure constrains the evolution of networks and their adaptive abilities. The focus is on the structural parameter network size. We show that small regulatory networks adapt fast, but not as good as larger networks in the longer perspective. Selection leads to an optimal network size dependent on heterogeneity of the environment and time pressure of adaptation. Optimal mutation rates are higher for smaller networks. We put special emphasis on discussing our simulation results on the background of functional observations from experimental and evolutionary biology.

Year:  2009        PMID: 19333363      PMCID: PMC3171436          DOI: 10.1155/2009/618502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol        ISSN: 1687-4145


  28 in total

Review 1.  Toward a new synthesis: population genetics and evolutionary developmental biology.

Authors:  N A Johnson; A H Porter
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  Genome size and developmental complexity.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.

Authors:  R Milo; S Shen-Orr; S Itzkovitz; N Kashtan; D Chklovskii; U Alon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization.

Authors:  Albert-László Barabási; Zoltán N Oltvai
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Modular organization of cellular networks.

Authors:  Alexander W Rives; Timothy Galitski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Structure and evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks.

Authors:  M Madan Babu; Nicholas M Luscombe; L Aravind; Mark Gerstein; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Influence of plasticity and learning on evolution under directional selection.

Authors:  Ingo Paenke; Bernhard Sendhoff; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Do deleterious mutations act synergistically? Metabolic control theory provides a partial answer.

Authors:  E Szathmáry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Accelerated evolution associated with genome reduction in a free-living prokaryote.

Authors:  Alexis Dufresne; Laurence Garczarek; Frédéric Partensky
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  5 in total

1.  Smaller, scale-free gene networks increase quantitative trait heritability and result in faster population recovery.

Authors:  Jacob W Malcom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Smaller gene networks permit longer persistence in fast-changing environments.

Authors:  Jacob W Malcom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evolution of competitive ability: an adaptation speed vs. accuracy tradeoff rooted in gene network size.

Authors:  Jacob W Malcom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Gene networks and metacommunities: dispersal differences can override adaptive advantage.

Authors:  Jacob W Malcom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Boolean gene regulatory model of heterosis and speciation.

Authors:  Peter Martin Ferdinand Emmrich; Hannah Elizabeth Roberts; Vera Pancaldi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.260

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.