Literature DB >> 19333046

Is sacral nerve stimulation an effective treatment for chronic idiopathic anal pain?

Ezio Falletto1, Alessandra Masin, Paola Lolli, Roberto Villani, Ezio Ganio, Valter Ripetti, Aldo Infantino, Alessandro Stazi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic idiopathic anal pain is a common, benign symptom, the etiology of which remains unclear. Traditional treatments are often ineffective. This study investigated the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in treating chronic idiopathic anal pain.
METHODS: Twelve patients (10 women and 2 men; mean age, 61.0 +/- 10.3 years; range, 48-82 years) implanted with a permanent device for sacral nerve stimulation were followed in the Italian Group for Sacral Neuromodulation (GINS) Registry. All patients had frequent chronic anal or perianal pain; 75 percent had previously undergone pelvic surgery. Pharmacologic and rehabilitative therapy had yielded poor results. Changes from baseline to last follow-up examination were evaluated for scores on a visual analog pain scale (0-10) and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) health status questionnaire. Manometric measurements recorded at last follow-up were compared with preimplantation values.
RESULTS: In one patient, the permanent device was removed because of technical failure. After a mean follow-up of 15 (range, 3-80) months, visual analog pain scores had significantly improved (from 8.2 +/- 1.7 to 2.2 +/- 1.3, P < 0.001). SF-36 physical component scores increased from 26.27 +/- 5.65 to 38.95 +/- 9.08, P < 0.02). Scores on the mental component showed improvement, although not significant. Postimplantation changes in manometric functional data were not significant, but sensitivity thresholds showed a considerable decrease.
CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up data showing improvements in scores on the visual analog pain scale and quality of life questionnaire indicate that, before adopting more aggressive surgical procedures, SNS should be considered for patients with chronic idiopathic anal pain in whom pharmacologic and biofeedback treatments have failed to produce effective results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19333046     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819d1319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  Sacral neuromodulation for bowel dysfunction.

Authors:  J-L Faucheron; G Martin
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  [Sacral nerve modulation in coloproctology].

Authors:  M Gelos; M Niedergethmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Sacral neuromodulation treating chronic pelvic pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Amr Mahran; Gina Baaklini; Daisy Hassani; Hassan A Abolella; Ahmed S Safwat; Mandy Neudecker; Adonis K Hijaz; Sangeeta T Mahajan; Steven W Siegel; Sherif A El-Nashar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Presacral abscess as a rare complication of sacral nerve stimulator implantation.

Authors:  A Gumber; S Ayyar; H Varia; S Pettit
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  J Martellucci; G Naldini; A Carriero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Chronic proctalgia and chronic pelvic pain syndromes: new etiologic insights and treatment options.

Authors:  Giuseppe Chiarioni; Corrado Asteria; William E Whitehead
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of chronic intractable anorectal pain -a case report-.

Authors:  Kyung Seung Yang; Young Hoon Kim; Hue Jung Park; Min Hye Lee; Dong Hee Kim; Dong Eon Moon
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2010-03-10

8.  Outcomes of sacral neuromodulation for chronic pelvic pain: a Finnish national multicenter study.

Authors:  A Zegrea; J Kirss; T Pinta; T Rautio; P Varpe; M Kairaluoma; M Aho; C Böckelman; M Lavonius
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Sacral neuromodulation for bowel dysfunction: a consensus statement from the Italian group.

Authors:  E Falletto; E Ganio; G Naldini; C Ratto; D F Altomare
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Biofeedback is superior to electrogalvanic stimulation and massage for treatment of levator ani syndrome.

Authors:  Giuseppe Chiarioni; Adriana Nardo; Italo Vantini; Antonella Romito; William E Whitehead
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.