Literature DB >> 19333043

Indications for subsequent surgery after endoscopic resection of submucosally invasive colorectal carcinomas: a prospective cohort study.

Dong Hyun Choi1, Dae Kyung Sohn, Hee Jin Chang, Seok-Byung Lim, Hyo Seong Choi, Seung-Yong Jeong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study explored predictive factors that affected oncologic outcomes after surgical resection or follow-up without surgery in patients with submucosally invasive colorectal carcinomas after endoscopic resection.
METHODS: Oncologic outcomes in terms of lymph node metastasis or tumor recurrence were assessed according to resection margin, histology, and depth of invasion.
RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients with submucosally invasive colorectal carcinomas after endoscopic resection were followed prospectively. Fifty-seven (65.5 percent) patients had risk factors of deep submucosal invasion and/or unfavorable histology. Among them, 30 underwent radical resection, and 6 patients had lymph node metastases. Twenty patients with risk factors were closely followed up and 3 recurrent carcinomas were detected. Ultimately, 9 of 57 high-risk patients (15.8 percent) exhibited lymph node metastasis or tumor recurrence. Among 30 patients without risk factors, none had lymph node metastasis or recurrent carcinoma. Univariate analysis showed that tumor budding (P = 0.003) and venous invasion (P = 0.021) were factors for lymph node metastasis. In multivariate analysis, only tumor budding was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis (P = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 16 percent of patients with submucosally invasive colorectal carcinoma and risk factors benefited from subsequent surgery. Tumor budding was the most significant factor for lymph node metastasis. Observation would be appropriate for patients without risk factors after endoscopic resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19333043     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197e37f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  29 in total

Review 1.  Tumour budding in colorectal cancer: what do we know and what can we do?

Authors:  Linde De Smedt; Sofie Palmans; Xavier Sagaert
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Yuki Ninomiya; Yuzuru Tamaru; Kenjiro Shigita; Nana Hayashi; Hiroyuki Egi; Takao Hinoi; Hideki Ohdan; Koji Arihiro; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Research Group.

Authors:  Yuzuru Tamaru; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Shinji Nagata; Yuko Hiraga; Toshio Kuwai; Akira Furudoi; Tadamasa Tamura; Masaki Kunihiro; Hideharu Okanobu; Koichi Nakadoi; Hiroyuki Kanao; Makoto Higashiyama; Koji Arihiro; Kazuya Kuraoka; Fumio Shimamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 7.527

4.  A three-tier classification system based on the depth of submucosal invasion and budding/sprouting can improve the treatment strategy for T1 colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kawachi; Yoshinobu Eishi; Hideki Ueno; Tetsuo Nemoto; Takahiro Fujimori; Akinori Iwashita; Yoichi Ajioka; Atsushi Ochiai; Shingo Ishiguro; Tadakazu Shimoda; Hidetaka Mochizuki; Yo Kato; Hidenobu Watanabe; Morio Koike; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Surgical Resection of Superficial Submucosal Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Beom Kim; Ho Su Lee; Hyo Jeong Lee; Jihun Kim; Dong-Hoon Yang; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Preceding endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal carcinoma does not affect the prognosis of patients who underwent additional surgery: a large multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ken Yamashita; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Shinji Nagata; Yuko Hiraga; Toshio Kuwai; Akira Furudoi; Tadamasa Tamura; Masaki Kunihiro; Hideharu Okanobu; Koichi Nakadoi; Hiroyuki Kanao; Makoto Higashiyama; Kazuya Kuraoka; Fumio Shimamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 7.  Controversies in the pathological assessment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aoife Maguire; Kieran Sheahan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) as a novel histological predictor of nodal metastases in pT1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Valeria Barresi; Giovanni Branca; Antonio Ieni; Luca Reggiani Bonetti; Luigi Baron; Stefania Mondello; Giovanni Tuccari
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Invasive front of colorectal cancer: dynamic interface of pro-/anti-tumor factors.

Authors:  Inti Zlobec; Alessandro Lugli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Long-term outcomes after treatment for pedunculated-type T1 colorectal carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Shinji Nagata; Akira Furudoi; Toshio Kuwai; Seiji Onogawa; Tadamasa Tamura; Hiroyuki Kanao; Yuko Hiraga; Hideharu Okanobu; Takayasu Kuwabara; Masaki Kunihiro; Shinichi Mukai; Eizo Goto; Fumio Shimamoto; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 7.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.