Literature DB >> 19332455

Early versus delayed, provisional eptifibatide in acute coronary syndromes.

Robert P Giugliano1, Jennifer A White, Christoph Bode, Paul W Armstrong, Gilles Montalescot, Basil S Lewis, Arnoud van 't Hof, Lisa G Berdan, Kerry L Lee, John T Strony, Steven Hildemann, Enrico Veltri, Frans Van de Werf, Eugene Braunwald, Robert A Harrington, Robert M Califf, L Kristin Newby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are indicated in patients with acute coronary syndromes who are undergoing an invasive procedure. The optimal timing of the initiation of such therapy is unknown.
METHODS: We compared a strategy of early, routine administration of eptifibatide with delayed, provisional administration in 9492 patients who had acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation and who were assigned to an invasive strategy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either early eptifibatide (two boluses, each containing 180 microg per kilogram of body weight, administered 10 minutes apart, and a standard infusion > or = 12 hours before angiography) or a matching placebo infusion with provisional use of eptifibatide after angiography (delayed eptifibatide). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischemia requiring urgent revascularization, or the occurrence of a thrombotic complication during percutaneous coronary intervention that required bolus therapy opposite to the initial study-group assignment ("thrombotic bailout") at 96 hours. The key secondary end point was a composite of death or myocardial infarction within the first 30 days. Key safety end points were bleeding and the need for transfusion within the first 120 hours after randomization.
RESULTS: The primary end point occurred in 9.3% of patients in the early-eptifibatide group and in 10.0% in the delayed-eptifibatide group (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.06; P=0.23). At 30 days, the rate of death or myocardial infarction was 11.2% in the early-eptifibatide group, as compared with 12.3% in the delayed-eptifibatide group (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.01; P=0.08). Patients in the early-eptifibatide group had significantly higher rates of bleeding and red-cell transfusion. There was no significant difference between the two groups in rates of severe bleeding or nonhemorrhagic serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation, the use of eptifibatide 12 hours or more before angiography was not superior to the provisional use of eptifibatide after angiography. The early use of eptifibatide was associated with an increased risk of non-life-threatening bleeding and need for transfusion. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00089895.) 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19332455     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  69 in total

1.  GPIIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonism Using Small Molecules Provides no Additive Long-Term Protection after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention as Compared to Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin.

Authors:  Michele Schiariti; Angela Saladini; Francesco Papalia; Placido Grillo; Cristina Nesta; Domenico Cuturello; Bindo Missiroli; Paolo Emilio Puddu
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2010-07-20

Review 2.  2011 ACCF/AHA focused update of the guidelines for the management of patients with Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (updating the 2007 Guideline): highlights for the clinician.

Authors:  Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Proteins interacting with the 26S proteasome.

Authors:  R Hartmann-Petersen; C Gordon
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Optimal use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  H Benjamin Starnes; Ankit A Patel; George A Stouffer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Contemporary treatment of unstable angina and non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (part 2).

Authors:  Shehzad Sami; James T Willerson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2010

Review 6.  Antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: economic considerations.

Authors:  William S Weintraub; Leonid Mandel; Sandra A Weiss
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Optimal revascularization for complex coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; David P Taggart
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  The 2012 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (UA/NSTEMI) Guideline: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Hani Jneid
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

9.  Trends in Enrollment, Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes According to Age in Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Kristian Kragholm; Sarah A Goldstein; Qinghong Yang; Renato D Lopes; Phillip J Schulte; Gwen M Bernacki; Harvey D White; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Robert P Giugliano; Paul W Armstrong; Robert A Harrington; Pierluigi Tricoci; Frans Van de Werf; John H Alexander; Karen P Alexander; L Kristin Newby
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Treatment of mechanical aortic valve thrombosis with heparin and eptifibatide.

Authors:  Amit N Vora; Thomas Gehrig; Thomas M Bashore; Todd L Kiefer
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.