Literature DB >> 1933239

Kinaesthetic acuity of stutterers and non-stutterers for oral and non-oral movements.

L F De Nil1, J H Abbs.   

Abstract

Six adult stutterers and six normal speakers were instructed to make the smallest possible movements of the jaw, lower lip, tongue and right index finger, both with and without continuous visual feedback. In the non-visual (kinaesthetic) condition, the stutterers showed significantly larger minimal displacements (MDs) than did the non-stutterers for oral but not for finger movements. However, movements made in the presence of visual feedback were consistently smaller for all subjects than those made without, and no differences in MD were found between the stutterers and the non-stutterers when visual feedback was provided. The results suggested the presence of a sensorimotor deficit among at least some adult stutterers that is confined to oral movements. Given the importance of somatic sensory feedback during speech production, these observed orosensory deficiencies among stutterers may provide important insights into causal factors which contribute to the breakdowns in stutterers' speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1933239     DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.5.2145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  11 in total

1.  Influence of afferent feedback on isometric fine force resolution in humans.

Authors:  H Henningsen; S Knecht; B Ende-Henningsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Auditory-motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Elizabeth A Wieland; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-03-02

3.  Brain activation abnormalities during speech and non-speech in stuttering speakers.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Mary Kay Kenney; Torrey M J Loucks; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Afferent and efferent aspects of mandibular sensorimotor control in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Control and prediction components of movement planning in stuttering versus nonstuttering adults.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Roman A Prokopenko; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Resting-state brain activity in adult males who stutter.

Authors:  Yun Xuan; Chun Meng; Yanhui Yang; Chaozhe Zhu; Liang Wang; Qian Yan; Chunlan Lin; Chunshui Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Classification of types of stuttering symptoms based on brain activity.

Authors:  Jing Jiang; Chunming Lu; Danling Peng; Chaozhe Zhu; Peter Howell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of Different Body Postures on the Severity of Stuttering in Young Adults with Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Almudhi; Hamayun Zafar; Shahnawaz Anwer; Ahmad Alghadir
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  No Evidence for Dystonia-Like Sensory Overflow of Tongue Representations in Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Sarah M E Vreeswijk; T N Linh Hoang; Alexandra Korzeczek; Nicole E Neef; Alexander Wolff von Gudenberg; Walter Paulus; Martin Sommer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Dissociated Development of Speech and Limb Sensorimotor Learning in Stuttering: Speech Auditory-motor Learning is Impaired in Both Children and Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Ayoub Daliri; J Randall Flanagan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.