Literature DB >> 1933233

Medial vs lateral frontal lobe lesions and differential impairment of central-gaze fixation maintenance in man.

T Paus1, M Kalina, L Patocková, Y Angerová, R Cerný, P Mecir, J Bauer, P Krabec.   

Abstract

The ability to maintain central-gaze fixation was studied in 35 patients with unilateral frontal lobe lesions. The stability of central-gaze fixation was tested in 2 oculomotor tasks requiring the suppression of reflexive saccades triggered by the sudden appearance of novel, peripheral visual stimuli. In the first task ('Instructed'), maintenance of gaze fixation was based on verbal instruction, whereas, in the second task ('Non-instructed'), it was based upon a foveating mechanism maintained by sensory stimulation during the performance of a categorization task. Patients with frontal lobe lesions were classified into 3 groups: a ventrolateral (n = 18), a dorsolateral (n = 10) and a medial (n = 7) group. The control group consisted of 20 healthy subjects. In the Non-instructed task, no group differences were found in the rate of reflexive saccades. Thus, lesions of the frontal lobe did not affect reactivity to extraneous stimuli per se. The only exception to this rule was the group of patients with ventrolateral lesions in the left frontal lobe, in which a higher number of reflexive saccades directed to the contralateral hemifield was observed. In the Instructed task, 2 different patterns of deficit in suppression of reflexive saccades were found. First, a bidirectional deficit was noted in the ventrolateral group, which might be attributed to an impairment in either maintaining a selected program of behaviour 'on-line' or suppressing inappropriate alternatives interfering with that program. Second, a unidirectional deficit in voluntary suppression of reflexive saccades triggered from within the contralateral hemifield was observed in the medial group. It is suggested that this type of deficit may reflect malfunctioning of the supplementary motor area--anterior cingulate system involved in the suppression of externally triggered interfering programs. Finally, no significant impairment was found in the dorsolateral group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1933233     DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.5.2051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  12 in total

Review 1.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action.

Authors:  C D Frith; S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Unconscious activation of motor responses in a hemiplegic patient with anosognosia and neglect.

Authors:  H Hildebrandt; A Zieger
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  PET study of the human foveal fixation system.

Authors:  L Petit; S Dubois; N Tzourio; S Dejardin; F Crivello; C Michel; O Etard; P Denise; A Roucoux; B Mazoyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Acute alcohol intoxication impairs top-down regulation of Stroop incongruity as revealed by blood oxygen level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ksenija Marinkovic; Elizabeth Rickenbacher; Sheeva Azma; Elinor Artsy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Performance monitoring local field potentials in the medial frontal cortex of primates: anterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Joshua W Brown; Melanie Leslie; Pierre Pouget; Veit Stuphorn; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Development of eye-movement control.

Authors:  Beatriz Luna; Katerina Velanova; Charles F Geier
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Functional neuroanatomy of antisaccade eye movements investigated with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  G A O'Driscoll; N M Alpert; S W Matthysse; D L Levy; S L Rauch; P S Holzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The saccadic Stroop effect: Evidence for involuntary programming of eye movements by linguistic cues.

Authors:  Timothy L Hodgson; Ben A Parris; Nicola J Gregory; Tracey Jarvis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.