G Imber1, R C Silich. 1. Weill College of Medicine, Cornell University, and Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY. USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For the past 4 decades, the full subcutaneous face lift has been the procedure of choice for treatment of the facial effects of aging. OBJECTIVE: We report the use of a less invasive procedure, the limited-incision face lift technique (LIFT), in a series of 1000 patients from January 1991 through January 2001. METHODS: Each of the lift procedures was performed while the patient was under intravenous sedation and local field block infiltration; no narcotics were administered. Suction-assisted lipoplasty was used to defat the submental area and jowls, except in cases of prominent platysmal bands in the erect position, when open lipoplasty was performed. Undermining was carried medially 5 to 6 cm from the preauricular incision throughout the cheek and over the mandible to the submental area. The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) was then developed distally; redundant SMAS tissue was resected at the apex of the closure and along its posterior border, followed by plication and closure. RESULTS: Patients were pleased with the operative experience and surgical results. Complications included 6 cases of hematoma that required surgical drainage. There were also numerous small collections. In addition, development of skin ripples behind the ear lobule occurred in some patients early in the series but virtually disappeared as we gained experience in the procedure. The necessity for immediate neck lifts as an additional procedure occurred in 6 early patients but was eliminated by careful patient evaluation for neck skin laxity later in the series. CONCLUSIONS: The LIFT is an alternative to the traditional face lift. Advantages include limited incision and scar as well as excellent correction of nasolabial folds, cheek laxity, jowls, and redundant submental skin and fat. It is not indicated for patients with significant lower neck skin laxity. (Aesthetic Surg J 2001;21:216-226.).
BACKGROUND: For the past 4 decades, the full subcutaneous face lift has been the procedure of choice for treatment of the facial effects of aging. OBJECTIVE: We report the use of a less invasive procedure, the limited-incision face lift technique (LIFT), in a series of 1000 patients from January 1991 through January 2001. METHODS: Each of the lift procedures was performed while the patient was under intravenous sedation and local field block infiltration; no narcotics were administered. Suction-assisted lipoplasty was used to defat the submental area and jowls, except in cases of prominent platysmal bands in the erect position, when open lipoplasty was performed. Undermining was carried medially 5 to 6 cm from the preauricular incision throughout the cheek and over the mandible to the submental area. The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) was then developed distally; redundant SMAS tissue was resected at the apex of the closure and along its posterior border, followed by plication and closure. RESULTS:Patients were pleased with the operative experience and surgical results. Complications included 6 cases of hematoma that required surgical drainage. There were also numerous small collections. In addition, development of skin ripples behind the ear lobule occurred in some patients early in the series but virtually disappeared as we gained experience in the procedure. The necessity for immediate neck lifts as an additional procedure occurred in 6 early patients but was eliminated by careful patient evaluation for neck skin laxity later in the series. CONCLUSIONS: The LIFT is an alternative to the traditional face lift. Advantages include limited incision and scar as well as excellent correction of nasolabial folds, cheek laxity, jowls, and redundant submental skin and fat. It is not indicated for patients with significant lower neck skin laxity. (Aesthetic Surg J 2001;21:216-226.).