Literature DB >> 19331769

Concurrent dengue and malaria in Cayenne Hospital, French Guiana.

Bernard Carme1, Severine Matheus, Gerd Donutil, Olivia Raulin, Mathieu Nacher, Jacques Morvan.   

Abstract

Dengue-malaria co-infection reports are scarce. Of 1,723 consecutive febrile patients in Cayenne Hospital, 238 had dengue (174 early dengue fever cases) and 393 had malaria (371 acute malaria); 17 had both. Diagnosis of 1 of these 2 infections should not rule out testing for the other infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19331769      PMCID: PMC2671414          DOI: 10.3201/eid1504.080891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Despite a wide overlap between malaria- and dengue-endemic areas, published reports of co-infections are scarce in the literature. The first 2 patients with concurrent malaria (Plasmodium falciparum) and dengue were identified in July 2005 () and November 2006 (P. vivax) (). Since then, a few publications described proven or suspected associations, but always as isolated cases (–). In French Guiana, a French territory in South America that is 92% covered by Amazon rain forest, malaria and dengue fever represent 2 major public health concerns. The annual number of P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria cases ranges from 3,500 to 4,500. In addition, all 4 dengue virus serotypes have been isolated in the country (). To determine the frequency of concurrent infection with dengue and malaria in French Guiana, we conducted a 1-year study of patients evaluated in the emergency department of Cayenne Hospital.

The Study

We carried out a retrospective study by testing blood and serum samples on 1,740 patients who consulted the emergency department of Cayenne Hospital seeking treatment for fever compatible with malaria and/or dengue during a 1-year period, July 2004–June 2005 (Figure). Diagnosis of malaria has always been quick; dengue diagnosis was initially conducted only in malaria-negative patients. In our study, dengue investigations were conducted retrospectively at the Pasteur Institute of French Guiana for 99% of patients (1,723/1,740) by using serum samples obtained at admission and frozen at –80°C. Medical records of case-patients with dengue–malaria co-infections were consulted retrospectively to look for severe or abnormal features.
Figure

Comparison of confirmed cases of dengue fever and of symptomatic malaria in patients examined at the emergency department of Cayenne Hospital, Cayenne, French Guiana, January 2004–March 2006. The black frame corresponds to the period of the retrospective study (July 2004–June 2005). *Cases confirmed by positive test results from reverse transcription–PCR or virus isolation (Pasteur Institute, Cayenne). †Cases diagnosed based on recorded fever or history of fever in the previous 24 h associated with microscopic detection of asexual forms of Plasmodium spp. by blood smear.

Comparison of confirmed cases of dengue fever and of symptomatic malaria in patients examined at the emergency department of Cayenne Hospital, Cayenne, French Guiana, January 2004–March 2006. The black frame corresponds to the period of the retrospective study (July 2004–June 2005). *Cases confirmed by positive test results from reverse transcription–PCR or virus isolation (Pasteur Institute, Cayenne). †Cases diagnosed based on recorded fever or history of fever in the previous 24 h associated with microscopic detection of asexual forms of Plasmodium spp. by blood smear. Malaria diagnosis was based on the identification of hematozoa on a thin blood film and/or on a thick blood film stained with Giemsa. The screening sensitivity was ≈6 plasmodia/µL (1/1,000 leukocytes). The asexual parasite load (PL) was quantified in percent parasitized erythrocytes for values >0.1 %. For lower values, classes were created using thick smears: class 1, <0.00125% but positive; class 2, >0.00125% but <0.0125%; and class 3, >0.0125% but <0.125%. Asymptomatic Plasmodium spp. carriage was considered for classes 1 and 2 (in the absence of prior antimalarial treatment and for case-patients residing >1 year in an area of malaria transmission). Virus isolation or reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) according to Lanciotti et al. () was performed on all serum samples obtained during the acute phase of infection, between day 0 and day 4 (n = 264). For malaria-positive samples, virus isolation was conducted on all samples without a date of onset of disease (n = 163). Serologic immunoglobulin (Ig) M testing was performed on all serum samples (n = 1,723). Dengue was detected in 238 case-patients (13.8%); among these, 73% (174/238) were confirmed by positive virologic diagnosis (isolation or RT-PCR), whereas 27% were probable dengue cases (positive IgM serology only). The first group was named early dengue cases (EDC) and the second group late dengue cases (LDC). Of the 1,723 patients, 393 (22.8%) had smear-positive malaria; of those, 251 (63.9%) were P. vivax, 133 (33.8%) were P. falciparum, 2 were P. malariae, and 7 were mixed P. vivax and P. falciparum. Most malaria-positive case-patients had a parasite count above class 2 (371/393 [94.4 %]), indicating acute malaria. Concurrent dengue (EDC and LDC) and malaria were confirmed in 17 of the 1,723 patients (1%), corresponding to 7.1% (17/238) of dengue cases and 4.1% (16/393) of malaria cases, respectively (Table). When considering acute malaria associated with EDC, the percentages of confirmed associations were 3.4% for dengue (6/174, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–6.2) and 1.6% for malaria (6/371, 95% CI 0.3–2.9). All 17 associations were considered clinically as malaria, including the 2 case-patients with low parasite counts. Antimalarial drugs were administered promptly in every case. Dengue serology and virology reports were available after the initial episode; however, these results did not influence patient management. Among the 6 acute concurrent infections, none was severe. The clinical evolution was always favorable. Three patients were hospitalized, all in the IgM-seropositive group, i.e., LDC; only 1 was severely ill. This patient, who had P. vivax malaria infection, was hospitalized for interstitial pneumonia with severe anemia. Intubation, blood transfusion, and antimicrobial drugs were required, but he was discharged from the intensive care unit after 11 days. No causative agent was identified for this pneumonia. The second patient was hospitalized for diabetes, the third because treatment with Riamet (arthemether + lumefantrine) was only available to inpatients.
Table

Clinical course and diagnosis in 17 case-patients with confirmed or suspected concurrent dengue and malaria, Cayenne Hospital, Cayenne, French Guiana, July 2004–June 2005*

Patient no./birth yearMalaria diagnosis
Hospitalized†Initial diagnosis and clinical signsDengue diagnosis
Conclusion
SpeciesParasitemia
IgMRT-PCRIso
%Class
1/1983 Pv <0.1C3NoMalaria+ DEN-1NDConfirmed acute concurrent disease
2/1984 Pv 0.15C4NoMalaria, Tp 51,000 + DEN-3NDConfirmed acute concurrent disease
3/1973 Pv 0.8C4NoMalaria + DEN-3NDConfirmed acute concurrent disease
4/1975 Pf 0.1C3NoMalaria + DEN-3NDConfirmed acute concurrent disease
5/1983 Pv 0.1C3NoMalaria + DEN-3NDConfirmed acute concurrent disease
6/1980 Pv 0.2C4NoMalaria, Tp 52,000, Hb 9.4SeroCNDConfirmed acute concurrent disease
7/1981 Pf <0.1C1NoMalaria‡NDDEN-3Confirmed concurrent infection
8/1953 Pv <0.1C3Yes§Malaria, Tp 71,000+Suspected concurrent infection
9/1952 Pv 0.8C4NoMalaria, Tp 30,000, BP 80/50+Suspected concurrent infection
10/1948 Pv 0.3C4NoMalaria, Tp 70,000+Suspected concurrent infection
11/1982 Pv 0.25C4NoMalaria+Suspected concurrent infection
12/1979 Pf 0.4C4Yes¶Malaria+Suspected concurrent infection
13/1956 Pv 0.5C4Yes#Malaria, Tp 63,000, Hb 5.9, Sat 83%+Suspected concurrent infection
14/1976 Pv 0.7C4NoMalaria+Suspected concurrent infection
15/1988 Pv 0.5C4NoMalaria, Tp 29,000, BP 90/50+Suspected concurrent infection
16/1974 Pv 0.1C3NoMalaria, HR 146 bpm+Suspected concurrent infection
17/1961 Pv <0.1C2NoMalaria‡+Suspected concurrent infection

*IgM, immunoglobulin M; RT-PCR, reverse transcription–PCR; Iso, isolate; Pv, Plasmodium vivax; – , negative; + positive; DEN, dengue; ND, not done; Pf, P. falciparum; Tp, thrombocytopenia++ (<100,000 platelets/µL); Hb, hemoglobin (reference range <10 g/L); BP, arterial blood pressure (systolic/diastolic); Sat, blood oxygen saturation; HR, heart rate; bpm, beats per minute.
†Hospitalization >8 hours.
‡Possible asymptomatic carrier of Plasmodium spp.
§For diabetes requiring insulin.
¶For treatment with Riamet (arthemether + lumefantrine).
#For interstitial pneumonia.

*IgM, immunoglobulin M; RT-PCR, reverse transcription–PCR; Iso, isolate; Pv, Plasmodium vivax; – , negative; + positive; DEN, dengue; ND, not done; Pf, P. falciparum; Tp, thrombocytopenia++ (<100,000 platelets/µL); Hb, hemoglobin (reference range <10 g/L); BP, arterial blood pressure (systolic/diastolic); Sat, blood oxygen saturation; HR, heart rate; bpm, beats per minute.
†Hospitalization >8 hours.
‡Possible asymptomatic carrier of Plasmodium spp.
§For diabetes requiring insulin.
¶For treatment with Riamet (arthemether + lumefantrine).
#For interstitial pneumonia.

Conclusions

Malaria and dengue must be suspected in febrile patients living in or returning from areas endemic for these infections. Although the usual places of contamination by malaria and dengue viruses are quite different in French Guiana, considering that the incubation phase is longer for malaria than for dengue and that the population’s mobility is high, a simultaneous clinical expression of the 2 diseases is plausible. Moreover, in French Guiana, dengue viruses have spread to malaria-endemic rural areas (). The confirmation of malaria is rapid, and after malaria is confirmed, dengue is usually ruled out without screening for it. Two methods can confirm dengue: dengue-specific IgM seroconversion or detection of dengue virus particles during the acute phase (day 0 to day 4 after onset of fever) by RT-PCR, which is faster and more specific. In published case reports (–), the diagnosis of dengue infection is usually made based on positive dengue IgM; however, this cannot confirm recent dengue, because IgM can persist for months and cross-react with other arboviruses (). If RT-PCR requires a specific laboratory and cannot be performed on site, a new test, the Platelia, is now easily included in any laboratory and is indicated particularly for early-acute phase samples (). To investigate the frequency of dengue and malaria co-infection, the Platelia test should be used in all cases of dengue-like or malaria-like syndrome, even when malaria diagnosis was positive, in regions where both infections may overlap. Of the 1,723 patients investigated in this study, 17 had concurrent dengue and malaria. In 10 of these patients, recent acute dengue fever could not be confirmed (LDC). Two patients, 1 of whom was part of the EDC group, could have been asymptomatic carriers of Plasmodium spp. (1 patient with P. falciparum and 1 with P. vivax) because of low parasitemia (). A true acute concurrent infection (strictly defined diagnosis) was confirmed in 6 case-patients. Concurrent acute malaria and recent dengue fever had a lower frequency than predicted by the multiplication of both prevalences, but such reasoning implies the same overlapping contamination areas for malaria and dengue, which it is not the situation in French Guiana. The greater prevalence of LDC than EDC associated with acute malaria infection illustrates the prolonged persistence of specific IgM or IgM cross-reaction, which increases the probability of a malaria case when comparing the short 4–5 day period corresponding to EDC. Virologic investigations using isolation or RT-PCR techniques were not performed on samples taken after the 4th day because of the usual disappearance of viremia. Additional associations where fever was initially caused by malaria and followed by dengue after the 4th day of malaria fever could have been undiagnosed. EDC were diagnosed on average after 4 days of fever, never 5. Thus, delayed complications of dengue or malaria may not be detected using this definition. Such complications could be observed in patients considered LDC. One of these patients had pneumonia, which has recently been described as a complication of P. vivax (). Although acute concurrent infections were benign in our study, special attention should be given to the possibility of co-infection with malaria and dengue, especially when P. falciparum is implicated. The distinction between severe dengue and severe malaria must be made in an emergency department or hospital setting because in both situations, early diagnosis is essential for patient care.
  13 in total

1.  Rapid detection and typing of dengue viruses from clinical samples by using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  R S Lanciotti; C H Calisher; D J Gubler; G J Chang; A V Vorndam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  High prevalence of asymptomatic Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum infections in native Amazonian populations.

Authors:  Fabiana P Alves; Rui R Durlacher; Maria J Menezes; Henrique Krieger; Luiz H Pereira Silva; Erney P Camargo
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Dual infection by dengue virus and Plasmodium vivax in Alappuzha District, Kerala, India.

Authors:  P S Thangaratham; M K Jeevan; R Rajendran; P Philip Samuel; B K Tyagi
Journal:  Jpn J Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.362

4.  A case of fatal Plasmodium falciparum malaria complicated by acute dengue fever in East Timor.

Authors:  David Ian Ward
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.345

5.  Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of dengue virus NS1 antigen in human serum.

Authors:  Philippe Dussart; Bhety Labeau; Gisèle Lagathu; Philippe Louis; Marcio R T Nunes; Sueli G Rodrigues; Cécile Storck-Herrmann; Raymond Cesaire; Jacques Morvan; Marie Flamand; Laurence Baril
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2006-09-20

Review 6.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome in Plasmodium vivax malaria: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Laura Price; Tim Planche; Charlotte Rayner; Sanjeev Krishna
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.184

7.  Concurrent dengue and malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax.

Authors:  Rajeev M Kaushik; Amit Varma; Reshma Kaushik; Kunwar J B S Gaur
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 2.184

8.  Concurrent infection with dengue and malaria.

Authors:  Ashish Bhalla; Navneet Sharma; Aman Sharma; Vikas Suri
Journal:  Indian J Med Sci       Date:  2006-08

9.  Concurrent plasmodium vivax malaria and dengue.

Authors:  Stan Deresinski
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Dengue spatial and temporal patterns, French Guiana, 2001.

Authors:  Annelise Tran; Xavier Deparis; Philippe Dussart; Jacques Morvan; Patrick Rabarison; Franck Remy; Laurent Polidori; Jacques Gardon
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  27 in total

1.  DenguePredict: An Integrated Drug Repositioning Approach towards Drug Discovery for Dengue.

Authors:  QuanQiu Wang; Rong Xu
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

2.  A clinical report on mixed infection of malaria, dengue and chikungunya from New Delhi, India.

Authors:  Mohd Abdullah; Ayesha Tazeen; Malik Hisamuddin; Irshad H Naqvi; Hirday N Verma; Anwar Ahmed; Shama Parveen
Journal:  Virusdisease       Date:  2017-10-19

3.  Clinical profile of concurrent dengue fever and Plasmodium vivax malaria in the Brazilian Amazon: case series of 11 hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Belisa M L Magalhães; Márcia A A Alexandre; André M Siqueira; Gisely C Melo; João B L Gimaque; Michele S Bastos; Regina M P Figueiredo; Ricardo C Carvalho; Michel A Tavares; Felipe G Naveca; Pedro Alonso; Quique Bassat; Marcus V G Lacerda; Maria P G Mourão
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 4.  Concurrent malaria and dengue infection: a brief summary and comment.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2011-08

5.  A case of cerebral malaria and dengue concurrent infection.

Authors:  Anwar Alam; Md Dm
Journal:  Asian Pac J Trop Biomed       Date:  2013-05

6.  An 11-year-old boy with Plasmodium falciparum malaria and dengue co-infection.

Authors:  Satja Issaranggoon na ayuthaya; Anchalee Wangjirapan; Peninnah Oberdorfer
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-01

7.  Leptospirosis and malaria as causes of febrile illness during a dengue epidemic in Jamaica.

Authors:  John Lindo; Paul D Brown; Ivan Vickers; Michelle Brown; Sandra T Jackson; Eva Lewis-Fuller
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Is dengue and malaria co-infection more severe than single infections? A retrospective matched-pair study in French Guiana.

Authors:  Loïc Epelboin; Matthieu Hanf; Philippe Dussart; Sihem Ouar-Epelboin; Félix Djossou; Mathieu Nacher; Bernard Carme
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Malaria and dengue in Hodeidah city, Yemen: High proportion of febrile outpatients with dengue or malaria, but low proportion co-infected.

Authors:  Rashad Abdul-Ghani; Mohammed A K Mahdy; Sameer Alkubati; Abdullah A Al-Mikhlafy; Abdullah Alhariri; Mrinalini Das; Kapilkumar Dave; Julita Gil-Cuesta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Concurrent infection with dengue and malaria: an unusual presentation.

Authors:  Mohsin Bin Mushtaq; Mehmood I Qadri; Aaliya Rashid
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2013-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.