Renee B Cadzow1, Timothy J Servoss. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Primary Care Research Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14215, USA. rcadzow@buffalo.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the association between perceived social support and the prevalence of physical and mental health conditions among adult patients of an urban free medical clinic. METHODS: Patients (n = 289) completed a health risk assessment (HRA) questionnaire that addressed a number of medical and social issues, including perceived social support and whether patients had been told they had certain health conditions. Among these questions were 2 validated instruments: the PRIME-MD for mental health disorder assessment and CAGE for alcohol risk assessment. A deidentified database of responses was analyzed for statistical associations between perceived social support and these health conditions. RESULTS: Among those with insufficient perceived social support there were higher rates of having physician-measured overweight/obesity, a heart condition, a previous heart attack, anxiety, and depression. The association between perceived social support and cardiovascular health existed among women but not among men. Higher income, not smoking, and consumption of high-fiber foods were associated with sufficient social support. CONCLUSION: Perceiving sufficient social support was associated with lower rates of several mental and physical health disorders. Social support may act as a barrier or buffer to poor health caused by the stressful living conditions often experienced by low-income underinsured people. Males and females may experience this social support buffering differently.
OBJECTIVE: This study examines the association between perceived social support and the prevalence of physical and mental health conditions among adult patients of an urban free medical clinic. METHODS:Patients (n = 289) completed a health risk assessment (HRA) questionnaire that addressed a number of medical and social issues, including perceived social support and whether patients had been told they had certain health conditions. Among these questions were 2 validated instruments: the PRIME-MD for mental health disorder assessment and CAGE for alcohol risk assessment. A deidentified database of responses was analyzed for statistical associations between perceived social support and these health conditions. RESULTS: Among those with insufficient perceived social support there were higher rates of having physician-measured overweight/obesity, a heart condition, a previous heart attack, anxiety, and depression. The association between perceived social support and cardiovascular health existed among women but not among men. Higher income, not smoking, and consumption of high-fiber foods were associated with sufficient social support. CONCLUSION: Perceiving sufficient social support was associated with lower rates of several mental and physical health disorders. Social support may act as a barrier or buffer to poor health caused by the stressful living conditions often experienced by low-income underinsured people. Males and females may experience this social support buffering differently.
Authors: Cassandra D Ford; Patricia Sawyer; Patricia Parmelee; Olivio J Clay; Martha Crowther; Richard M Allman Journal: J Health Dispar Res Pract Date: 2014
Authors: Aruna Chandran; Amanda Long; Ashley Price; Jeannie Murray; Errol L Fields; Christina M Schumacher; Adena Greenbaum; Jacky M Jennings Journal: J Community Health Date: 2020-10
Authors: Anne Kouvonen; Mai Stafford; Roberto De Vogli; Martin J Shipley; Michael G Marmot; Tom Cox; Jussi Vahtera; Ari Väänänen; Tarja Heponiemi; Archana Singh-Manoux; Mika Kivimäki Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kiarri N Kershaw; Arlene L Hankinson; Kiang Liu; Jared P Reis; Cora E Lewis; Catherine M Loria; Mercedes R Carnethon Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 5.363
Authors: Laura Ponce de León; Jean Pierre Lévy Mangin; Soledad Ballesteros Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 3.390