Literature DB >> 19330753

Morbidity in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: is VATS lobectomy really safe?

R Kawachi1, H Tsukada, Y Nakazato, H Takei, Y Koshi-ishi, T Goya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATS lobectomy) with standard thoracotomy in terms of morbidity and mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients with clinical (c) stage I non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgery between 1999 and 2003 were retrospectively analyzed. All of the patients underwent surgical resection that was at least as extensive as lobectomy. VATS lobectomy was performed in 73 patients, and thoracotomy in 176 patients.
RESULTS: The clinical stages were stage IA in 151 (60.6 %), and stage IB in 98 (39.4 %), and the pathological stages were I in 206 (82.7 %), II in 16 (6.4 %), and III in 27 (10.9 %). The mean operation time was 291 minutes for VATS and 215 minutes for thoracotomy ( P = 0.0 042). The mean blood loss was 160 ml and 191 ml ( P = 0.2 738), respectively. Mortality was 1.4 % (1/73) in the VATS group, and 2.3 % (4/176) in the thoracotomy group ( P = 0.6 438). Morbidity was 19.2 % (14/73), and 24.4 % (44/176), respectively ( P = 0.1 315). Air leakage was the most frequent complication. Anastomotic leakage was found in four patients who underwent thoracotomy. The incidence of pulmonary vessel injury was 8.2 % in the VATS group and 1.7 % in the thoracotomy group ( P = 0.0 361). While pulmonary vessel injury was observed frequently in the intermediate part of the study period, the incidence decreased in the late period.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary vessel injury, longer operation times, and greater blood loss have been frequently observed with VATS lobectomy. Proficiency is required to perform VATS lobectomy, and the procedure should be performed by a well-trained surgeon as indicated by the results of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19330753     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1039267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0171-6425            Impact factor:   1.827


  6 in total

1.  Use of staplers and adverse events in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Dragan Subotic; Aljaz Hojski; Mark Wiese; Didier Lardinois
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi-xin Cai; Xiang-ning Fu; Qin-zi Xu; Wei Sun; Ni Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery complications.

Authors:  Mariusz P Łochowski; Józef Kozak
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  The feasibility of a Two-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  Hyun Koo Kim; Ho Kyung Sung; Hyun Joo Lee; Young Ho Choi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Massive Intraoperative Blood Loss Secondary to Pulmonary Artery Injury During a Video-Assisted Thorascopic Surgery: The Importance of Protocols and Preparedness.

Authors:  Brian Keyes; Erin Giles
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-06-15

6.  Characteristics of Medical Adverse Events/Near Misses Associated With Laparoscopic/Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Study Based on the Japanese National Database of Medical Adverse Events.

Authors:  Takashige Abe; Sachiyo Murai; Yasuyuki Nasuhara; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.844

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.