BACKGROUND: Research on clinical teaching in medicine tends to focus on preceptors and senior attending physicians as the primary source of learning for medical students. As a result, there is an artificial separation of 'teacher' from context in much of the research on clinical teaching in medicine. AIMS: The central aim of this study was to challenge the taken-for-granted assumption that student learning can be attributed primarily to a preceptor or attending physician on a rotation. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-two medical students and forty-one clinical faculty members generated explanations for a study that showed a positive effect on NMBE results for 3rd year clerkship students who had at least one highly effective clinical teacher during their clinical rotation in medicine. RESULTS: Student and faculty explanations resulted in fourteen factors and six propositions describing the nature of highly effective clinical teaching. Students believed contextual factors influenced their own learning, but did not comment on that possibility in the study (Griffith CH, Georgesen JC, Wilson JF. 2000. Six-year documentation of the association between excellent clinical teaching and improved student examination performance. Acad Med 75(10): October Supplement). Most clinical faculty did question the assumption that one teacher could have that effect. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend refocusing research on clinical instruction toward engagement within a community of professionals, rather than attributing 'power' to a single clinical teacher.
BACKGROUND: Research on clinical teaching in medicine tends to focus on preceptors and senior attending physicians as the primary source of learning for medical students. As a result, there is an artificial separation of 'teacher' from context in much of the research on clinical teaching in medicine. AIMS: The central aim of this study was to challenge the taken-for-granted assumption that student learning can be attributed primarily to a preceptor or attending physician on a rotation. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-two medical students and forty-one clinical faculty members generated explanations for a study that showed a positive effect on NMBE results for 3rd year clerkship students who had at least one highly effective clinical teacher during their clinical rotation in medicine. RESULTS: Student and faculty explanations resulted in fourteen factors and six propositions describing the nature of highly effective clinical teaching. Students believed contextual factors influenced their own learning, but did not comment on that possibility in the study (Griffith CH, Georgesen JC, Wilson JF. 2000. Six-year documentation of the association between excellent clinical teaching and improved student examination performance. Acad Med 75(10): October Supplement). Most clinical faculty did question the assumption that one teacher could have that effect. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend refocusing research on clinical instruction toward engagement within a community of professionals, rather than attributing 'power' to a single clinical teacher.