Literature DB >> 19330379

Early oral versus "traditional" postoperative feeding in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intestinal resection: a randomized controlled trial.

L Minig1, R Biffi, V Zanagnolo, A Attanasio, C Beltrami, L Bocciolone, E Botteri, N Colombo, S Iodice, F Landoni, M Peiretti, G Roviglione, A Maggioni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A randomized controlled trial was performed to assess the outcome of early oral postoperative feeding (EOF) compared with traditional oral feeding (TOF) in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing laparotomy with associated intestinal resection.
METHODS: Patients aged 18-75 years, undergoing elective laparotomy, and with preoperative diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy, were eligible. Exclusion criteria included infectious conditions, intestinal obstruction, severe malnutrition, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > or =4, and postoperative stay in the intensive care unit lasting >24 h. Patients allocated to EOF received liquid diet in the first postoperative day and then regular diet. Patients received traditional feeding scheme until resolution of postoperative ileus to start liquid diet. The primary end-point of the trial was length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Between January 1st, 2007 and March 15th, 2008, 40 patients were randomized to receive either EOF or TOF. Hospital stay in patients who received EOF (n = 18) was 6.9 days versus 9.1 days in the TOF group (n = 22) (P = 0.022). Requirements for analgesic and antiemetic drugs, intensity of pain, intestinal function recovery, mean levels of postoperative satisfaction, postoperative complications, and quality-of-life scores did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Early resumption of oral intake is feasible and safe in gynecologic oncology patients undergoing intestinal resection as part of a planned surgical procedure. Moreover, significant reduction in length of hospital stay was demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19330379     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0444-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  22 in total

Review 1.  Controlling postoperative ileus by vagal activation.

Authors:  Tim Lubbers; Wim Buurman; Misha Luyer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: implementing a new standard of surgical care.

Authors:  Alon D Altman; Limor Helpman; Jacob McGee; Vanessa Samouëlian; Marie-Hélène Auclair; Harinder Brar; Gregg S Nelson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies: possible advantages also for head and neck surgery patients?

Authors:  Chiara Bianchini; Stefano Pelucchi; Antonio Pastore; Carlo V Feo; Andrea Ciorba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Steven Kwasi Korang; Kirstine Halberg Engell; Marie Skøtt Nielsen; Kang Zhang; Maria Didriksen; Lisbeth Lund; Niklas Lindahl; Sara Hallum; Ning Liang; Wenjing Xiong; Xuemei Yang; Pernille Brunsgaard; Alexandre Garioud; Sanam Safi; Jane Lindschou; Jens Kondrup; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-19

5.  Changes in short-term health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic oncologic laparotomy: an associated factor analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Minig; Jorge Iván Vélez; Edward L Trimble; Roberto Biffi; Angelo Maggioni; Diana D Jeffery
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Early Oral Feeding Following McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Open-label, Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Hai-Bo Sun; Yin Li; Xian-Ben Liu; Rui-Xiang Zhang; Zong-Fei Wang; Toni Lerut; Chia-Chuan Liu; Alfonso Fiorelli; Yin-Kai Chao; Daniela Molena; Robert J Cerfolio; Soji Ozawa; Andrew C Chang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Early versus delayed oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery.

Authors:  Kittipat Charoenkwan; Elizabeth Matovinovic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-12

Review 8.  Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Linda Van Le
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.347

9.  Exploring the malnutrition status and impact of total parenteral nutrition on the outcome of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Xin Yan; Sanyuan Zhang; Junmei Jia; Jiaolin Yang; Yilai Song; Haoran Duan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Consensus views on implementation and measurement of enhanced recovery after surgery in England: Delphi study.

Authors:  Amy Knott; Samir Pathak; John S McGrath; Robin Kennedy; Alan Horgan; Monty Mythen; Fiona Carter; Nader K Francis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.