Literature DB >> 19330106

Evaluation of the exposure-response relationship of lung cancer mortality and occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium based on published epidemiological data.

Edwin van Wijngaarden1, Kenneth A Mundt, Rose S Luippold.   

Abstract

Some have suggested a threshold mechanism for the carcinogenicity of exposure to hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI). We evaluated the nature of the exposure-response relationship between occupational exposure to Cr(VI) and respiratory cancer based on results of two recently published epidemiological cohort studies. The combined cohort comprised a total of 2,849 workers employed at two U.S. chromate production plants between 1940 and 1974. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for lung cancer in relation to cumulative Cr(VI) exposure categories were reported using regional mortality rates. Linear additive and multiplicative relative risk regression models were fit to the SMRs of the individual and combined studies. Both models fit the data from the individual studies reasonably well; however, the fit was somewhat less adequate for the pooled data. Meta-analysis of the slope estimates obtained from the multiplicative relative risk model showed substantial heterogeneity between the two epidemiological studies. In conclusion, these data indicate that a linear dose response describes the relationship between Cr(VI) and lung cancer reasonably well, and therefore these analyses do not necessarily support the threshold hypothesis for the lung carcinogenicity of Cr(VI). However, these results must be interpreted with recognition of the limitations of the use of epidemiological data in the evaluation of nonlinear exposure-response patterns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exposure–response pattern; hexavalent chromium; lung cancer; meta-analysis

Year:  2004        PMID: 19330106      PMCID: PMC2647818          DOI: 10.1080/15401420490426972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med        ISSN: 1540-1421


  18 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting.

Authors:  S L Normand
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Statistical methods in epidemiology: a comparison of statistical methods to analyze dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  K M Boucher; M L Slattery; T D Berry; C Quesenberry; K Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Design and conduct of occupational epidemiology studies: II. Analysis of cohort data.

Authors:  H Checkoway; N Pearce; J M Dement
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Meta-analytic approaches to dose-response relationships, with application in studies of lung cancer and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  R L Tweedie; K L Mengersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995 Mar 15-Apr 15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Epidemiology and quantitative risk assessment: a bridge from science to policy.

Authors:  I Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Observations on the dose-response curve for arsenic exposure and lung cancer.

Authors:  I Hertz-Picciotto; A H Smith
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Lung cancer among workers in chromium chemical production.

Authors:  H J Gibb; P S Lees; P F Pinsky; B C Rooney
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 9.  Threshold mechanisms and site specificity in chromium(VI) carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S De Flora
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 10.  Role of epidemiologic studies in evaluating the carcinogenicity of chromium compounds.

Authors:  J A Hathaway
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Carcinogenicity of Poorly Soluble Low Toxicity Particles: Commentary on Epidemiology as a Risk Assessment "Reality Check".

Authors:  Kenneth A Mundt; Annette B Santamaria; William J Thompson; Christopher A Bates; Corey Boles; G Scott Dotson; Mei Yong
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.