Literature DB >> 19329750

Variability of blowfly head optomotor responses.

R Rosner1, M Egelhaaf, J Grewe, A K Warzecha.   

Abstract

Behavioural responses of an animal are variable even when the animal experiences the same sensory input several times. This variability can arise from stochastic processes inherent to the nervous system. Also, the internal state of an animal may influence a particular behavioural response. In the present study, we analyse the variability of visually induced head pitch responses of tethered blowflies by high-speed cinematography. We found these optomotor responses to be highly variable in amplitude. Most of the variability can be attributed to two different internal states of the flies with high and low optomotor gain, respectively. Even within a given activity state, there is some variability of head optomotor responses. The amount of this variability differs for the two optomotor gain states. Moreover, these two activity states can be distinguished on a fine timescale and without visual stimulation, on the basis of the occurrence of peculiar head jitter movements. Head jitter goes along with high gain optomotor responses and haltere oscillations. Halteres are evolutionary transformed hindwings that oscillate when blowflies walk or fly. Their main function is to serve as equilibrium organs by detecting Coriolis forces and to mediate gaze stabilisation. However, their basic oscillating activity was also suggested to provide a gain-modulating signal. Our experiments demonstrate that halteres are not necessary for high gain head pitch to occur. Nevertheless, we find the halteres to be responsible for one component of head jitter movements. This component may be the inevitable consequence of their function as equilibrium and gaze-stabilising organs.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19329750     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.027060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  13 in total

1.  Integration of binocular optic flow in cervical neck motor neurons of the fly.

Authors:  Adrian Wertz; Jürgen Haag; Alexander Borst
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Dynamics of optomotor responses in Drosophila to perturbations in optic flow.

Authors:  Jamie C Theobald; Dario L Ringach; Mark A Frye
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Central gating of fly optomotor response.

Authors:  Juergen Haag; Adrian Wertz; Alexander Borst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Complementary motion tuning in frontal nerve motor neurons of the blowfly.

Authors:  Isabella Kauer; Alexander Borst; Jürgen Haag
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Towards a biomimetic gyroscope inspired by the fly's haltere using microelectromechanical systems technology.

Authors:  H Droogendijk; R A Brookhuis; M J de Boer; R G P Sanders; G J M Krijnen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Contextual modulation of behavioral choice.

Authors:  Chris R Palmer; William B Kristan
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates.

Authors:  Björn Brembs
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Relating neuronal to behavioral performance: variability of optomotor responses in the blowfly.

Authors:  Ronny Rosner; Anne-Kathrin Warzecha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Discriminating external and internal causes for heading changes in freely flying Drosophila.

Authors:  Andrea Censi; Andrew D Straw; Rosalyn W Sayaman; Richard M Murray; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action.

Authors:  Martin Egelhaaf; Norbert Boeddeker; Roland Kern; Rafael Kurtz; Jens P Lindemann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.